Once Upon a Time in the West is one of the best westerns
ever made. And to think that director
Sergio Leone didn’t even want to make it because he was tired of doing
westerns. He couldn’t find any interest
in a film he wanted to make titled Once Upon a Time in America , so he resorted to doing what he was
best known for in the U.S. It wouldn’t be until the 1980s before he
would finally get to make that other film.
Despite the fact that this wasn’t his first choice he put together a
great cast and story. It includes not
two antagonists, but four or even five – all with their own agendas that cause
them to sometimes join with one another and sometimes to oppose one another. That complexity is rare in westerns, whose
stock in trade is easily identifiable good guys and bad guys. Perhaps this complexity came from the fact
that the film was co-written by Leone, Bernardo Bertolucci, and Dario
Argento. The latter two would go on to
become successful directors in their own right.
The film opens with three men (two of them played by western
character actors Jack Elam and Woody Strode) waiting for a train to
arrive. It very consciously echoes the
classic western High Noon (1952). Leone
wanted the stars of his last film The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (1966) –
Clint Eastwood, Lee van Cleef, and Eli Wallach – to cameo as these three men,
but that didn’t work out. The scene is
one of the more famous film openings for how long and drawn out it is. It emphasizes the boredom of the location of
the station, as well as the resolve of the men waiting. Sound becomes very important as every drop of
water and creak of a windmill vane become more and more apparent as time goes
on.
There are a lot of looks exchanged by the men as well. And when one of them is being played by Jack
Elam, even just a shot of him staring is enough to be entertaining. He certainly had a unique look because of his
eyes, perfect for playing the kinds of characters he did in westerns.
Eventually the train arrives and we meet the first of the
main characters, a “man with no name” played by Charles Bronson. He is supposed to meet a man named Frank, but
these other men were sent instead. They
are there to kill him, but this man kills them instead. He then heads into town.
We now meet the second of the main characters – Frank
himself. A distant ranch named
Sweetwater is getting ready for the arrival of a new bride for the man who owns
it. Just then shots ring out and all of
the people there fall dead, except for a small boy. The camera pans up from the boots of one of
the shooters, there is a close up of his face, and we get a big surprise – it is Henry Fonda, whose character of
Frank proceeds to shoot the boy so that no witnesses are left. This very clearly establishes that one of the
most well known “good guy” actors out there is most definitely not playing to
type in this film.
Speaking of eyes, Fonda originally showed up for filming
with a mustache and brown contact lenses to play the evil character. Leone immediately had him shave and get rid
of the lenses. He wanted every viewer to
immediately recognize Fonda as the bad guy so evil he will gun down a small
child without thinking about it.
We meet the third main character – the bride who comes into
town. She is Jill McBain (Claudia
Cardinale) and while riding to the ranch, she meets the last of the main
characters – Cheyenne
(Jason Robards). They, along with the
man from the train, all end up in the same saloon. Cheyenne
dubs that man “Harmonica” because he is always playing one. Harmonica lets Cheyenne
(a man with a bad reputation) know that the men at the train wore the same
dusters as the ones Cheyenne
and his men wear. It is as if someone
was trying to frame Cheyenne
for Harmonica’s death.
When Jill gets to the ranch and finds everyone dead, and a
duster just like Cheyenne ’s left behind, a
warrant for Cheyenne ’s
arrest is issued. He ends up out at Jill’s
ranch and swears that while he may be a bad man, even he wouldn’t kill a little
kid. Meanwhile, we find out Frank is
working for a rich railroad baron named Morton and it was at Morton’s orders
that Frank killed everyone at the Sweetwater ranch.
Why did he do that, though?
The mystery deepens when tons of lumber get delivered to the ranch –
enough to build several buildings.
Jill’s murdered husband had paid cash for it all ahead of time. What is it for? And what is Harmonica doing trying to get a
meeting with Frank, especially after Frank’s men tried to kill him? And will Cheyenne be able to continue to dodge the authorities? And will Frank be content to keep working for
the rich man or might he get some ideas of his own?
As you can tell, there are a bunch of interesting
storylines, as well as a several running mysteries. We find out the answers to all of them by the
time the film is done. And as complex as
the story gets, this film still satisfies those people looking for all the
usual things they would expect from a western.
There is a man on man gunfight.
There are intrigues around the railroad.
There are people looking to steal other’s property. There is someone looking to get revenge for a
killing of a relative.
In short, this film has a little something for
everyone. The only negative thing I have
to say about it is really silly – Claudia Cardinale wore the most humungous
1960s false eyelashes in the film. They
were so distracting and out of place that I laughed a few times during scenes
that were supposed to be serious. If
that’s the biggest thing I can complain about, though, then this film must be
pretty damn good. Unless you just
absolutely hate westerns, I highly recommend you see this film.
Chip’s Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
DVD Blu-ray Instant Video
DVD Blu-ray Instant Video
If you were to ask me what are the 10 great westerns. I would put this film at #2 w/ The Good, the Bad, & the Ugly at #1. It's a film of what not just the genre should be but it's also the kind of film I think manages to get better since its release. It's very operatic and has elements that I think today's film lack.
ReplyDeleteNice write-up, Chip. The score was amazing and so was the cinematography. The opening scene is stunning to look at, good observation that emphasizes the boredom of the location of the station, as well as the resolve of the men waiting.
ReplyDeleteI like stylistic films, so it worked for me, but you could also argue the director at times was showing off his sets rather than getting on with the story.
Probably in my top 10 of westerns I've seen. Was surprising to see Henry Fonda as a villain, that was a treat.
While this isn't my favorite Western, I'd be hard-pressed to stop it from being at or near the top of greatest in the genre. It really has everything you could want. And that's not a dig to say it's not my favorite. I'd still put it top-5.
ReplyDeleteWhat clinches it for me is Henry Fonda playing such an evil role. I love when actors dive in against type like that.
Classic, Classic, Classic. You cannot go wrong with this one. My dad and I often watch westerns together. I miss westerns of this caliber. The last good ones we've had have been remakes, '3:10 to Yuma' and 'Appaloosa.'
ReplyDelete@thevoid99, Chris, and SJHoneywell - This would definitely make my Top 10 westerns and very likely my Top 5. The Searchers or High Noon might be my number 1. The Ox-Bow Incident would be right up there, too.
ReplyDelete@Chris and SJHoneywell - Yes, Fonda as the villain certainly adds a whole other dimension to this film. I wonder what it would have been like to have seen this for the first time in a movie theater not knowing about Fonda's character.
@msmariah - If you haven't seen it, I thought 2003's Open Range was a pretty good modern-made western.