Friday, July 27, 2012

Movie – M (1931)

Fritz Lang’s 1931 film M is a landmark in movie history.  While he directed other films that are classics (most notably 1927’s Metropolis) this is the film that I consider to be his very best.  It also features the greatest career role for lead actor Peter Lorre – and this is a man who was in almost 100 films, including The Maltese Falcon and Casablanca.  M isn’t just some dusty, dated film that is only watched now because of its place in history, though.  It is every bit as relevant and chilling today as it was back when it first came out more than eighty years ago.

M was decades ahead of its time in regard to its storyline and the themes in it – especially the psychology of what drives a killer.  This was Lang’s first sound film, but he didn’t just take it easy and record only dialogue.  He made M one of the first films to use voice-over narration and to use a musical theme to identify a character.  Several times during the film we hear Lorre’s character whistling In the Hall of the Mountain King before he appears on screen.  We also hear it when he is stalking his victims.  This practice later became a basic part of movie making.  Try hearing the Jaws theme in your head and not thinking of the shark lurking just outside of camera range.  The whistling in M generates the exact same feeling of menace.

The film opens with police and parents in a German city in a frenzy over someone who has abducted and killed eight children in the last year.  Parents are urged to walk their children to and from school.  Police have hundreds, if not thousands, of pages of research, clues, and dead end leads.  All they know is the brand of cigarettes the person smokes and that he apparently uses candy to lure the children away.  The viewer is almost immediately shown who the killer is, though.  We see Hans Beckert (Lorre) meeting a little girl with a balloon, and in a poignant moment a little later we see the balloon floating away.  (Note – there is never any violence against children shown in the film, if you are concerned about that.)

Because the police are turning the city inside out to find the man, they are disrupting the business of the criminal underground.  The various crime bosses come together and decide that they’ve got to find this killer, too.  There’s a great series of scenes cutting back and forth between the police and the gangsters where both groups are brainstorming strategies on how to catch him.  (And if you think you’ve seen smoking in a movie before, wait until you see these scenes).

In an early example of psychological profiling, the police have an idea of what kind of person would be committing these crimes.  (Lang has denied that this film was based on a 1920s serial killer in Germany, but he did do quite a bit of research into the criminally insane when he was preparing this movie.)  This profile eventually leads the police to the apartment of Beckert, but he is not home.  They decide to lie in wait for him.

Meanwhile, the criminals have decided that they literally need to watch every child and report back when a man is seen with one.  The best way to do this without arousing suspicion is to have beggars do the monitoring because they are on every street.  The break they need comes when a blind beggar hears a man whistling the same tune he heard the day that he sold a balloon to the last girl who was murdered.  (Trivia – the whistling we hear was done by Lang, not Lorre, because Lorre couldn’t whistle well.) 

Another beggar has to act quickly, because this is Beckert and he has a child with him.  The beggar manages to mark Beckert with a chalk “M” (for murderer) on his back shoulder to allow others to follow him until he can be captured.  The child with Beckert notices the “M” and mentions it to him.  This leads to the iconic image of Lorre as Beckert looking at his reflection in a shop window and finally feeling real fear as he realizes people are on to him.

He tries to run, but the criminals corner him and take him away just before the police arrive.  What follows is my favorite scene in the film where the criminals put Beckert “on trial” for his crimes and he pleads with them that he doesn’t mean to do these things; he doesn’t even understand why he does these things.  Even though his crimes are terrible I couldn’t help but feel a little bit for this man who is just as baffled and horrified by his own actions as everyone else is. 

What will happen to Beckert?  Will the criminals murder him?  Will they turn him over to the police?  Will the police find where the criminals took Beckert?  If so, will they stand aside and let the criminals take care of him, or will they take him into custody like they are supposed to do, regardless of their horror for his crimes?  There are some great moral questions raised in the latter part of the film.

M is one of those movies that even if it doesn’t sound like something you would like, you still should see this movie.  I think you will end up agreeing that the story is filled with emotion and tension, both of which will keep you very engaged.  I give this film my highest recommendation.

Chip’s Rating: 5 out of 5 stars

           DVD                      Blu-ray                 Instant Video

10 comments:

  1. Excellent movie and excellent review.

    This is indeed as relevant now as it was back then. Both the hunt for the child murderer but also the hysteria associated when everybody is suspecting everybody.

    The for me most terrifying scene is the opening with the mother who waits anxiously for her little daughter that never comes home. The nightmare of any parent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, the fear it also stirs up when everyone seems to be getting accused, plus the fear of the parents, is quite emotional.

      Delete
  2. I really like this movie. In addition to being a great watch, in addition to its being really disturbing, and even more than Lorre's great performance, this is a completely ballsy film. It would be daring to create a film on this topic now, particularly with the classic "Ich muss!" speech from Lorre at the end. To do this in the 1930s is unthinkable. It's hardly sympathetic, but it certainly paints the killer as something other than just a monster.

    There's also great editing here--the back and forth between the police and the criminals, for instance. Lang also plays with the sound, deadening it when the one guy is covering his ears, for instance. Lang was experimenting with a bunch of different ideas here, and they all worked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. I read a story that Thalberg showed the movie to his people, yelled at them for not bringing him movies like that, but then admitted that if they had brought that story to him he would have vetoed it.

      I had forgotten about the deadening of the sound. It's been a few years since I last saw this. Thanks for mentioning it.

      Delete
  3. There's always room for Peter Lorre! Good job, Chip. I like how you pointed out the fact that Lang utilized sound masterfully, even though this was his first talkie.

    On a completely different note, I can't help but think of the old MTV ads that featured a doctored version of the scene with Lorre glancing over his shoulder.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. Your mention of the Mtv ads rings a faint bell with me. Were they hand drawn animation? Now I'm wondering what they looked like. This is a long shot, but you don't happen to have a link to it, do you?

      Delete
  4. Here it is (back when MTV actually played music)... I think it was rotoscoped: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSswFt-bELM

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Okay, I remember that now. Thanks (and good memory.)

      Delete
  5. great review Chip, reminding me how far I've already come since 1930 in my noirathon and how few of the films can compare to this masterpiece.

    odd fact, people find my blog on average of 9 times a week by searching "M hand"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is an odd fact. My recent parent post for Films where Charlize Theron Does Not Get Naked has remained popular - I suspect because it has the words "Charlize Theron" and "naked" in it.

      Delete