I watched 18 new movies in April, plus rewatched 1 film. This was a light month, and the total is only
as high as that because I realized a few days ago that I had not seen a single
entry from the They Shoot Pictures Don’t They list yet this month.
I figured I would start April by watching the final three
films that were new to the 2014 yearend IMDB Top 250 list. The problem was that they were three Indian movies
with a combined running time of close to 12 hours. Once I got done with those, I just didn’t
feel like picking up other films. I’ve
had three disks from Netflix sitting on my coffee table for a month now,
unwatched.
I dropped my total entries left to see on the 2015 TSPDT
list under 15. The 14 I have remaining
are:
757. The Last Detail (1973)
809. To Live (1994)
846. Dodes’ka-den (1970)
864. Twin Peaks : Fire Walk
with Me (1992)
877. A Better Tomorrow (1986)
911. Two English Girls (1971)
922. Silent Light (2007)
950. Gregory’s Girl (1980)
963. The Threepenny Opera (1931)
977. Mauvais Sang (1986)
982. O Lucky Man! (1973)
983. Still Life (2006)
988. Broadway Danny Rose (1984)
995. The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner (1962)
I’m going to see all of them anyway, but please let me know
if there are some among these that you would tell me, “You have to see that.” I’m
curious because none of them excite me that much in terms of sitting down to
watch them, other than maybe the Kurosawa one that was new to the list this
year (Dodes’ka-den).
Here are the 18 new movies I saw in April. Highlighted films are ones to which I would
give at least three stars out of five.
TSPDT (13): Big
Deal on Madonna Street (1958), Burnt by the Sun (1994), Ju Dou (1990), Goodbye, South, Goodbye (1996), Le Corbeau (1943), When a Woman Ascends the Stairs
(1960), Vengeance Is Mine (1979), Outskirts (1933), The Death of Maria
Malibran (1972), Mephisto
(1981), Pakeezah (1972), We All Loved Each Other So Much (1974), Twenty
Years Later (1985)
IMDB (3): Gangs of Wasseypur (2012),
Dil Chahta Hai (2001),
Swades (2004)
Other Movies (2): 30 for 30: Four Days in October
(2010), Jesus Camp
(2006)
Rewatches (1): 30 for 30: You Don’t Know Bo
(2013)
30 for 30: Four Days
in October (2010) – Being a Red
Sox fan, I am predisposed to like this doc about the historical comeback they
had against the New York Yankees in the 2004 American League Championship
series. I think any fan of the underdog (which is most people) will like
watching this, though. 4 stars
Gangs of Wasseypur
(2012) – Letterboxd has this
movie split into two separate entries (1 and 2). It's actually a single movie
that ended up getting multiple releases in theaters because even in India five and
a half hours is a long time to sit and watch a movie. IMDB has it correctly as
a single entry. Gangster movies
aren't exactly my favorite genre. If they are well made I like them, but I'd
pick several other genres to watch first. And while I've watched more than my
fair share of long films, if a movie is long simply for the sake of being long
then it can really suck. (I'm looking at you Satantango). Combine those things together and a 5 1/2
hour long gangster film from India
was going to have to earn a decent
rating from me. And you know what? It did. 3 stars
Dil Chahta Hai (2001)
– A bit overlong, and it's easy to
see the big emotional beats coming, but they still work anyway. If you like Aamir Khan this is another
appealing movie from him. 4 stars
Jesus Camp (2006)
– Jesus Camp is a documentary about
how fundamentalist Christians in the U.S. ensure they get their message
to as wide a range of children as possible.
It was this month’s Steve’s Selection.
You can read my full review here.
3 stars
Swades (2004) – Completely predictable, but aside from
that it hits on a lot of important points in regards to the situation in some
of the back country areas of India .
That's not a surprise considering it came from the director of Lagaan, which
also dealt with the importance of overcoming what separates people and showed
how strong people are when they band together. 3.5 stars
Big Deal on Madonna Street
(1958) – This is supposed to be a very funny comedy, but other than a smile
in a few places it didn’t do much for me.
Maybe something was lost in translation.
(It’s an Italian film.) Part of
the problem is I like heist movies, but I dislike movies about losers. This is a movie about a bunch of losers who
try to pull off a heist, but at first it looks like it’s going to be a
thrilling heist because we don’t realize they are losers yet. 2.5 stars
Burnt by the Sun
(1994) – This is a strange
combination of farce, slapstick comedy, surrealism, and for the last 30
minutes, political drama. To be honest, I'm not really sure what I think of
this movie. It won the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar, but only after a
special screening for less than one tenth of the Academy members, who were then
the only ones allowed to vote in this category. I've seen two of the other nominees for that
year - Farinelli and Eat Drink Man Woman. I'd pick the latter as a better film
than this one, but in 1994, just a couple years after the Soviet
Union fell apart, I'm sure this Russian film about the
backstabbing under Stalin resonated far more with the voters. The best part of the film is the little girl
and her relationship with her father. They were real life father and daughter
and that shows on screen. 3 stars
Ju Dou (1990) –
This is an early Zhang Yimou/Gong Li film about a tragic relationship. It’s almost a little noir in that a woman is
being abused by her husband and she wants the other man to kill him for her so
they can be together. The movie doesn’t
continue as a noir, though. 3.5 stars
Goodbye, South, Goodbye
(1996) – Yet another Taiwanese slice of life film. Either these are the only kinds of films made
there, or these are the only kinds of films made there that critics like
because I’m hard pressed to come up with another movie from a Taiwanese filmmaker
that I have seen that is any other genre.
2 stars
Le Corbeau (1943)
– Inspired by real events in a 1920’s French village, a small town in France
gets in an uproar because someone is writing poison pen letters and mailing
them to many people. They accuse them of
sexual infidelity, religious hypocrisy, and most damning for the town doctor,
that he performs abortions. It’s quite a
mystery as to who is sending them and why.
The title translates as “The Raven”, which is the signature placed on
these anonymous letters. 3.5 stars
When a Woman Ascends
the Stairs (1960) – I can see this Japanese film being touted as an early
feminist movie, although I’m sure it was not intended that way when it was
made. A widow makes ends meet by being a
hostess in a club. She’s not a
prostitute, although some of the other hostesses are. She is thinking of opening her own club, but
has family and friends approaching her for financial support. Some also put pressure on her because a
proper woman would remarry, preferably to a man as rich as possible, and stop
being a hostess. 3.5 stars
Vengeance Is Mine
(1979) – I found out afterwards that this is apparently based on a real
Japanese serial killer. If so, he was
not a very interesting one. Much of the
movie consists of him randomly killing for no apparent reason, and in wildly
different ways, which is not usually the norm.
They usually repeat the same method over and over. In some ways this reminded me of Henry:
Portrait of a Serial Killer, but that film is much better than Vengeance Is
Mine. 2.5 stars
Outskirts (1933)
– Early Soviet sound film with plenty of propaganda as I’ve come to expect from
these kinds of movies from this time and place.
In this case it’s the tale of how the evil Russian Tsarist rulers sent
people to die in WWI and devastated the common people – up until the Bolshevik
Revolution. Surprisingly, though, it
does feature a sympathetic look at a German prisoner. 2 stars
The Death of Maria
Malibran (1972) – A complete and utter waste of time. Unless you need to watch it to complete a
list, don’t bother looking for this one.
1 star
Mephisto (1981) –
A provincial German actor goes to Berlin
and becomes a sensation just as Hitler is coming to power. He has to keep choosing between staying to
become an even bigger star or leaving and possibly becoming a nobody
again. 3 stars
Pakeezah (1972) –
There are some pretty shots and gorgeous scenery in this Indian film, but
ultimately the story isn’t that gripping.
A woman who is supposed to marry a rich man instead moons over a note a
stranger left her while she was sleeping on a train. Then she loses her memory and runs into the
man and decides to marry him. Then she can’t
because people think she is a prostitute.
And so on. 2.5 stars
We All Loved Each
Other So Much (1974) – Disjointed would be a polite way to describe this
movie. It actually seems to exist
primarily to name check just about every Italian film and filmmaker that was
considered to be worth anything from WWII to the 1970s, including a recreation
of the fountain scene from La Dolce Vita complete with cameos from Fellini and
Mastroianni. 2 stars
Twenty Years Later (1985)
– Extremely specialized documentary about a film the same director started to
make in the early 1960s about a local communist leader in a rural part of Brazil . The country underwent a coup and when that
happened the communists were scattered and some killed. Seventeen years later the filmmaker takes his
surviving footage back to the people he originally filmed and has them talk
about what they remember from working with him and what has happened to them
since then. 2 stars
And here’s a bonus just for the folks that have read this
far: although technically I saw Avengers:
Age of Ultron in May (today), I will include some comments here for those
that are wondering about the movie:
When you make a film as great as the first Avengers there's
not much place to go but down when it comes to the sequel. While Age of Ultron
is still entertaining, it's definitely a notch below the first one.
The biggest problem is it just doesn't have a good enough
villain, or at least the presentation of the villain just didn't work well
enough.
The second problem is that Whedon drank the Kool-Aid and the
first two major action sequences were shot in shakycam with sub-second editing,
making them far less effective. Thankfully, he shot some later action scenes,
and the quieter scenes, with a steadier camera.
The best part of this film are the quieter scenes. We learn
more about Hawkeye and Black Widow especially. In addition, at least one other
character from each of the movie franchises appeared, giving some continuity.
None of the main characters from the Agents of SHIELD TV show appeared, though,
in case you were hoping for that.
There did seem to be places where things felt rushed, as if
scenes had been cut. It makes me wonder if there might be an extended edition
released at some point.
Finally, don't bother sitting through the credits unless you
just like reading them. There's no end scene. There is one at the beginning of
the credits, but once the screen goes to black with scrolling names there is
nothing else, except the message "The Avengers Will Return". The
audience I saw it with was disappointed by this.
Chip’s Rating: Four stars out of Five
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (1992) got mixed reviews upon release. I found it ok, but not great. It's a prequel and is slightly predictable if you have already watched the show. The disco scene was interesting, because they used subtitles due to the loud music, which I thought that was a neat idea. I love Lynch so of course I watched it.
ReplyDeleteI liked The Last Detail (1973) for the performances, and I would watch anything by Hal Ashby from the 70s.
I remember you loved the first Avengers. I haven't seen Ultron, I know you dislike shakycam :) At least it wasn't every scene. You mention it felt rushed. I heard Whedon's first cut was 3½ hours long and had to cut it down to 2½ to make the studio happy. I also read an extended edition is set for dvd(where the character development might be further explored)
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/avengers-age-of-ultron-home-video-release-will-feature-an-extended-edition-with-an-alternate-ending-20150426
Thanks for the info.
DeleteI watched Twin Peaks as it was originally being broadcast and at first it was fantastic. I feel that if the network had left it alone and ended it as the standalone mini-series it was intended to be, it would be remembered as one of the best things ever put on television. Instead they had Lynch change the last episode to be a cliffhanger to set up a whole extra season. I was excited for it to come back, but it didn't take too many episodes to realize that not only did Lynch not know who killed Laura Palmer, he didn't care. He was just putting episodes out there to be weird and to generate questions. This turned me off to both the show and to Lynch. To this day I still feel it's a case of the Emperor's New Clothes when Lynch releases yet another film with no discernable coherent plot and then some people spend MONTHS analyzing scenes and trying to figure out Lynch's secret story. To me, there is no story; Lynch just does this knowing some people will fill in the blanks if from time to time he gives "hints" as to what they should look for - "check out the color of the lampshade in the scene".
The result of all of this is that when this prequel was produced I had little interest in seeing it. I admit I was somewhat curious, but figured I'd just get burned again. I'm not opposed to watching it, though, and this will finally give me a reason to do so. And since it's been 25 years since I saw any of these characters I do wonder what my reaction will be to them now.
Thanks for the Avengers link. It's interesting that it speculates there may be more action scenes with Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch. I didn't really think of them being shortchanged. If anything, I think an extended edition that includes scenes bridging Ultron from the time he first come to be, to the point where we see him as a fully formed antagonist would go a ways toward addressing what I felt was the lack of a great villain.
There are also some unanswered questions on what happened between the last time we saw some of these characters and the beginning of this movie, especially Ironman/Tony Stark.
SPOILERS IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN IRONMAN 3:
At the end of Ironman 3 he had decided to destroy all of his suits of armor, both his own, and the robotic ones, and not be Ironman anymore. Yet when the Avengers sequel begins he's back in the suit, and he has a whole army of robotic suits, and this is what leads to Ultron when he tries early on to make the suits even more autonomous.