The film Far from Heaven is set in the 1950s, but explores
topics that no 1950s film would have been able to touch – homosexuality and
interracial romance. Writer/director
Todd Haynes is a big fan of Rainer Werner Fassbinder (Ali: Fear Eats the Soul),
who was in turn a big fan of Douglas Sirk (All That Heaven Allows). Fassbinder’s film, which I reviewed earlier
for this Interracial Relationships category, was a tribute to Sirk’s melodramas
from the 1950s. And Haynes deliberately
made Far from Heaven have the same look and feel of Sirk’s films, while
employing some techniques from Fassbinder.
The result – a film with both Fassbinder and Sirk in its pedigree – is
one almost guaranteed to make professional movie critics get all tingly in
their special areas. Here’s the thing –
it’s not just a “critics’ film”; it’s well worth watching for regular people,
too.
Frank and Cathy Whitaker (Dennis Quaid and Julianne Moore)
seem to be the perfect 1950s married couple.
He’s a successful advertising executive and she’s the classic
housewife. They have two perfect
children. They are very popular with
their peers. In fact, the first hint
that anything is astray comes when Cathy is preparing to host a gathering at
their home. Frank calls for her to come
get him at the police station. He tells
her it was all some silly misunderstanding; he had ended up in the wrong place
at the wrong time and an overzealous cop got the wrong idea. The specifics are not discussed.
At some future point Cathy, being the perfect housewife that
she is, decides to make dinner for Frank, who is working late. She takes it to his office. When she gets there she is stunned to see Frank
kissing another man. He confesses to her
that he had “problems” when he was younger, but he thought he had been “cured”
of them. He volunteers to attend therapy
to permanently rid himself of this attraction to men. Cathy agrees to put a brave face on things
while this is going on. Internally,
though, her entire perfect world has been turned upside down.
While this is going on, she discovers that the young,
handsome son of her elderly black gardener has taken over the business. His name is Raymond Deagan (Dennis
Haysbert). He’s an educated man, quite
witty, and all around charming. He has a
young daughter of his own.
Frank’s therapy has predictably not been going well. He’s started drinking heavily and one night
when he is unable to get aroused enough to make love to Cathy he strikes her in
anger. Any chance of saving their
marriage is now gone and he files for divorce.
Left with no anchor in her life Cathy starts socializing more and more
with Raymond. (Parallels to the
relationship of the older widow with her younger gardener from Sirk’s film All
That Heaven Allows are entirely intentional.)
One day Raymond takes her to his part of town. It exposes Cathy to an entire world she never
knew existed. As bad luck would have it
she is seen in Raymond’s car by a neighborhood busybody and soon she is the
object of scorn among all her female friends.
Will Cathy reject any further contact with Raymond, innocent as it is,
or will she defy her friends and social conventions and try to have a real
relationship with Raymond? And it takes
two to have a relationship. What does Raymond
think about all of this? Is he even
interested in Cathy in a romantic way?
Julianne Moore is the star of the film and she received
nominations for Best Actress from several awards organizations, including the
Oscars. (In all, Far from Heaven received
four Oscar nominations.) I’ll be honest,
though. While I think Moore did her usual fine job, I was more
impressed by both Quaid and Haysbert, perhaps because I wasn’t expecting
anything too much from them. In fact,
this may very well be the best dramatic performance I’ve ever seen from Dennis
Quaid. He really nails the turmoil that
a 1950s man would have with being homosexual, yet being unable to conceive any
possibility other than his urges are evil and destructive.
I mentioned at the top that this film tried to capture the
look and feel of the 1950s films. They
did this, in part, by using the same lighting techniques and camera filters
that were in vogue in the 1950s. They
succeeded because one of the Oscar nominations was for Best Cinematography.
Far from Heaven is not exactly a feel good film, as you can
surmise from the description. It doesn’t
have the level of melodrama of Sirk’s movies, though, and that is a good thing
in my book. For me the real reason to see
it is for the performances of the three principals and for a take on what a
contemporary 1950s film would have looked like without the restrictions from
society and the MPAA. Far from Heaven
will probably be best appreciated by fans of Sirk and/or Fassbinder, but it’s
worth checking out even if you know nothing about them. If it sounds interesting then I recommend you
give it a try.
Chip’s Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
I like this more than you do, in part because this so accurately nails the look of a Sirk film. All that Heaven Allows is absolutely the right one to compare it to as well--the two films are connected at the soul in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteWhen I did the 1001 Movies list, I found this early on for a couple of dollars and bought it, knowing I'd eventually have to watch it. I'm so happy that I did, because it's one I'm very pleased to have in my collection.
I'm glad you enjoyed it. And that was some good luck with the blind buy you did. I've had mixed results when I've done it.
DeleteIt think you have a slightly higher appreciation for Sirk films in general than I have, too, so it doesn't surprise me that we would have similar feelings on this very "Sirkian" movie.
I do think those familiar with the Sirk films may enjoy this one more than those who aren't. I like Far From Heaven partly for this reason, though I admit to liking Ali: Fear Eats the Soul a bit more.
ReplyDeleteOf the three related films I'd rank them Ali: Fear Eats the Soul, then All That Heaven Allows, then Far from Heaven, but with only small gaps between them.
Delete