Sunday, December 2, 2012

Movie – The Butterfly Effect (2004)

The Butterfly Effect might be the number one example of how a studio can destroy a movie by taking control of it away from its creators.  Co-writers/co-directors Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber crafted a movie that scared the studio.  They forced them to completely change the entire tone and events of the ending.  The result was that the film went from “damn, they actually went there” to “wait a minute, that doesn’t resolve anything.”  The movie “underperformed” at the box office and didn’t get a lot of good reviews.  Thankfully, when it was released on DVD the original version of the film was finally available to be seen.  People couldn’t believe how much better it was over the theatrical version.  If you have not seen this film, avoid the theatrical version and watch the “directors’ cut”.  That is the version I am recommending.

Early in the movie the title is explained as coming from chaos theory where a butterfly flapping its wings could cause a hurricane somewhere else.  The film’s creators need to take a little science fiction history lesson of their own.  The term really comes from a classic Ray Bradbury short story titled A Sound of Thunder.  In that story some men travel millions of years into the past.  One kills a butterfly and when they return to the present they find that this one, small change has created a massive, cumulative change to the future.  This movie uses the same concept.

Evan (Ashton Kutcher – who also executive produced) had a history of blackouts when he was a child.  He would just wake up not knowing what had happened.  They seemed to occur when he was in high stress situations.  When he is in college he finds his old journals where he wrote about these things.  By accident he finds he can somehow cast his consciousness back in time to those events.  His adult self is in his younger body, controlling it.  This finally explains the blackouts he had.

Because these are all important events he can’t resist trying to fix the things that went wrong in them, whether it was bombing a mailbox or dealing with a child predator.  Unfortunately he finds out that when his consciousness returns to the present, things have changed in ways he didn’t envision.  For instance, after one trip he goes from being an outcast to being a member of the cool crowd.  Sometimes he gets a huge shock at what has changed about his situation, though.  Impacts on Kayleigh (Amy Smart) and Lenny (Elden Henson), friends he has had since childhood, are much greater.  I don’t want to describe any of these changes because you should see them as they happen.

He also finds out that his father may have had the same ability.  He doesn’t know much about the man, other than that he went insane.  Evan begins to have nosebleeds and even possibly brain damage from his repeated attempts to “fix” the past.  Each time he tries to make things right, he not only ends up in a situation that may be worse, but he may also be permanently damaging himself.  Is this what happened to his father?  And what if the biggest negative event in the early years of his friends’ lives was in having him as a friend in the first place?  This is where the studio ruined the ending.

Without discussing spoiler details, the original ending is not only daring, but it makes perfect sense.  Everything Evan has experienced up to that point leads inescapably to the conclusion that this is the right course of action for him.  On the other hand, the tacked on, sort of bittersweet ending of the theatrical version left the entire movie unresolved since Evan has learned nothing from all of his actions.  The DVD contains two other, even happier endings than the one that was shown theatrically.

Kutcher carries this movie.  While I have never been that impressed with him, this would be the movie that I would pick as the one where he did his best job.  Even though he was already a star when this movie was made, its 13 million dollar budget was still relatively small, although it is the largest of any of the films in my Time Travel on a Budget category.

The Butterfly Effect is a dark movie.  It deals with various traumas, including childhood ones, in a sometimes unflinching manner.  This isn’t done for the shock value, but to show why Evan would continue to drive himself past the point of harm in order to try to prevent these things from happening.  If you feel this would be too heavy for you, then you may want to skip this movie.  For everyone else, I highly recommend it.

Chip’s Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

           DVD                      Blu-ray                 Instant Video

9 comments:

  1. I've seen both endings of this film, and I completely agree. The director's cut is leaps and bounds better than the theatrical release. I really wonder if the studio had had the guts to release the director's cut, if we wouldn't have been talking about Butterfly Effect in the awards season, at least a little bit.

    In our household, my husband and I just pretend that the director's cut is the only version of this film.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "In our household, my husband and I just pretend that the director's cut is the only version of this film."

      That's definitely the way to go. Another movie to do this with is The Chronicles of Riddick. The studio apparently cut close to a half an hour out of that movie, decimating the plot. The result was a steady sequence of action events occurring for reasons that were mostly unfathomable to the audience. The original cut shows that there was a decent story there about racial genocide and explains why Oscar winner Judi Dench would have agreed to appear in it.

      Delete
  2. I've never seen this. I am definitely intrigued.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you happen to see it, please let me know what you thought of it.

      Delete
  3. I didn't know about this directors cut and as such i have dismissed this movie, I may have to check out the directors cut.

    On the subject of the Bradbury story, did you ever see the movie adaptation? We may even have discussed this before. Personally i quite enjoyed it despite its made for tv look and feel, it certainly impressed me more than most science fiction movies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, I didn't know there was a movie version of it. What is the name of it? Even though I don't watch The Simpsons I did somehow end up seeing an episode based on it. Homer finds a time machine and screws stuff up. He keeps trying to fix things in the past. He finally ends up in one present where his whole family is part lizard. Exhausted, he just shrugs and says, "close enough."

      Delete
  4. Same name, directed by Peter Hyams and starring Edward Burns & Ben Kingsley. IMDB Page for it. I think I read that it had major production company issues and it has a very low rating on imdb, as I said before I didn't actually find much wrong with it, certainly not to warrant all the negativity surrounding it.

    I haven't seen that episode, do you remember if it was a Treehouse of Horrors one? Might make it easier to track down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the link. I'm surprised I hadn't heard of it, with the cast that was in it.

      I don't watch the Simpsons, so I don't know what episode it might have been, or even what year it might have been. Sorry. The way it ended makes me believe it was not a regular episode, since continuity would place Homer in that world for all subsequent episodes. (Although continuity may not be anything the Simpsons show cares about.)

      Okay, I spent some time searching. It turns out it was the fifth Treehouse of Horror episode, which aired in 1994. It also had parodies of The Shining and Soylent Green in it.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the research, it will prove invaluable. Leah loved The Simpsons and I love the movies parodied, perfect!

      Delete