As I write this The Revenant appears to be the emerging
favorite to win Best Picture at the 2016 Oscars. That is still more than a month away, though,
so we will have to see if it keeps its momentum or if it starts to fade. It is a simple tale of survival and revenge
very loosely based on the story of Hugh Glass, a frontiersman in the 1820s who
was attacked by a bear, left for dead, but managed to make his way back to a
fort. It stars Leonardo DiCaprio in what
might finally be an Oscar winning performance for him. It’s got a lot of good things going for it,
but The Revenant also has some flaws.
First things first, this is an absolutely beautiful film to
see. It should easily walk away with the
Oscar for Cinematography. And they shot
almost the entire film using only natural light, which limited them to only a
few hours a day. This caused problems
because they went so far over schedule shooting in Canada
(80 days ballooned to 9 months) that all the snow melted and they had to
relocate to southern Argentina
to complete the film. It was also shot
chronologically. All of these things
caused the budget to more than double during the shooting.
Hugh Glass (DiCaprio) is a frontiersman hired to accompany a
group of trappers in 1823 in what is now South Dakota
in the U.S. He knew the land because he had married a
Pawnee woman and they had had a son together.
His wife had been killed, but his now teenage son is still with him on
this expedition. At the opening of the
film this expedition is attacked by a tribe of Arikaras. Only a few men get away, and with only a
fraction of the pelts they had collected.
While heading down a river Glass warns that the Arikara will
be waiting to ambush them and that they have to leave the river and travel
overland if they want to survive.
Captain Andrew Henry (Domhnall Gleeson), the leader of the expedition,
agrees with him despite the strong protests of one of the men, John Fitzgerald
(Tom Hardy). To travel overland they
will have to leave even more of the pelts behind, meaning months of work is
going to earn them almost no pay.
Fitzgerald targets Glass as the cause of all his problems. He probably already had an issue with Glass
because there is a story that Glass might have killed a white man while he
(Glass) was living with his Pawnee wife and child.
While traveling overland Glass is attacked by a grizzly
bear. It’s a triumph of practical and
cgi effects because DiCaprio and the bear were never together. It’s a stunning scene to watch. Glass manages to kill the bear, but is too
wounded to move. The other men find him
and try to tend to his wounds, but they figure he’s only got hours to
live. A few days later he’s still
hanging on, though, unable to move or speak.
Captain Henry orders the men to carry him, but they have to travel over
steep mountains and it’s just not practical.
They still all figure Glass will die, but the Captain orders
that he get a proper burial. Glass’ son
Hawk (Forrest Goodluck) stays with him, as does a young man named Bridger (Will
Poulter). Captain Henry asks for one
more volunteer, and after Hawk and Bridger offer up their shares of the money
Fitzgerald offers to stay, too.
Fitzgerald obviously has no intention of doing much for
Glass other than kill him, but the Captain takes the coward’s way out and
pretends not to know. Fitzgerald does
try to smother Glass but Hawk stops him.
Fitzgerald kills Hawk and covers it up when Bridger returns. Fitzgerald then makes up a story about a
large group of Indians nearby and that they have to abandon Glass to get to
safety. Fitzgerald and Bridger lie when
they catch up to Captain Henry and say that Glass died from his wounds and that
they gave him a proper burial. Again,
the Captain pretends to believe them.
In the meantime, Glass does not die. He slowly forces himself to move, hide from
unfriendly Indians and French trappers, get food, a horse (which he rides off a
cliff, as seen in the trailer), and generally be the manliest man you may have
ever seen. The movie then spends a
considerably amount of time alone with him as Glass makes his way across
cinematically beautiful landscape. When
Glass finally makes his way back to the fort where Captain Henry, Fitzgerald,
and Bridger are at things come to a head.
DiCaprio does a great job in the role, much of which is silent
expressions since he is either too injured to speak, or he is alone. Hardy has also received praise for his work
in the movie.
The film takes a lot of liberties with both the story and
what life is like in winter. In reality
Glass never had a son, he wasn’t the enemy of the French, there was no specific
Arikara attack, he didn’t seek revenge for being left behind, and the bear attack
and abandonment took place in warm weather in August in relatively flat
territory – hardly the frigid, rugged, snow covered mountains shown in the
film.
The movie also assumes that hypothermia does not exist. There are many scenes where men and horses go
into water that would be not much above freezing and they simply get out and
continue on. In one scene Glass shrugs
off his outer clothing (the bear pelt) and he’s fine. None of the men ever seem to have a problem
with their gunpowder being wet from being in the water. (They still used muskets at this time.) These
are artistic leaps done because running water is a lot more interesting
cinematically.
And it’s the “pretty images above all” philosophy that is
the biggest flaw in this movie. Much
like a Terence Malick film, for the first hour or so you just sit in awe of the
imagery, but eventually you become a little immune to it, and you realize that
you’re more than an hour into the movie and not a whole lot of story has
actually happened. And then you further
realize that there’s more than another hour and a half to go like this. (It’s a 2 hour, 36 minute long movie.) As it kept dragging on and on my enjoyment of
the film kept dropping. The story could
have (and has) fit easily into an hour long episode of any western TV show.
Director Innaritu has a chance to go back to back at the
Oscars since his movie Birdman won last year.
(And cinematographer Lubezki very likely will go back to back to back
with Gravity, Birdman, and this film.) Birdman,
however, had multiple stories in it and was just under two hours long. The Revenant is 40 minutes longer and with
about one third the story of Birdman.
If you’re the kind of person who isn’t concerned with story
or plot, and who loves beautiful images, then this is absolutely the film for
you. If you’re like me and expect something
more from your top films, including that they have a fully developed story in
them, then you may find this lacking. I
still recommend it, and if I gave half star ratings this would get 3.5 stars. Just don’t expect the greatest movie ever
made.
Chip’s Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
I think has some of the most jaw-dropping scenes of the year(the bear attack, the river scene, the cliff and horse scene), but I agree that ir's overlong and there is not much substance. I did read an article where a native american professor argues the film is a game-changer in how it depicts kidnapping, trafficking, and violating Indian women as a crime, and the violation of nature by the white man with the scene of a mountain of bison skulls: http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/2016/01/14/dicaprios-revenant-astounds-being-fair-indians
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link. I find it interesting how much praise he gives the movie for its depiction of Indians when I have also read comments criticizing The Revenant for presenting only two dimensional portraits of them where they only show up to commit violence. Of course, I don't know if those criticisms are being written by Indians like the positive article above, or if they are being written by people filled with "white guilt".
DeletePersonally, I found it interesting that the Indian Chief essentially was living within his own "The Searchers" story in the John Wayne part, just from the other side.