We have come to the eleventh of twelve movie selections
Steve Honeywell at 1001plus has made for me.
This one is Auto Focus, a look at 15 years in the life of actor Bob
Crane who is best known for his starring role as Colonel Hogan on the TV show
Hogan’s Heroes, and for being the victim of a still unsolved murder. Not as well known is that he was an early
adopter of video camera and video tape technology which he then used to record
himself having sex with any number of female fans. This movie delves into that quite a bit. From listening to the separate commentary
tracks from both the director and the two main actors it’s apparent that they
saw Bob Crane in completely different lights.
The result is a mixed view of the man.
I’ve actually owned this movie on DVD for years, but I had
never watched it. I bought it at a going
out of business sale a video rental place was having. As a kid I had been a fan of the TV show
Hogan’s Heroes when it was syndicated on a local TV channel during the day in
the 1970s. I remember hearing that Bob
Crane was murdered in the late 70s, that they pretty much knew who did it, but
that the local DA didn’t bother to prosecute.
The general understanding was that the DA felt Crane “got what was
coming to him” because of all the photos and film of sex that had been
discovered with the body. As I found out
from watching a documentary included on the DVD, that was actually not the
case. More on that in a bit.
The film isn’t really about the murder, but about how (in
director Paul Schrader’s mind) Crane stopped pretending to be an upright family
man and revealed to the world the sleaze he really was. Actors Greg Kinnear, who plays Crane, and
Willem Dafoe, who plays a man named John Carpenter, feel the film is about how
fame can corrupt anyone.
The movie opens with Crane as a pious, church going, best
friends with the priest, non-drinking, non-smoking, interviewed by Christian
publications, loving husband of 15 years, and father of three children. As Schrader makes apparent in his commentary
he feels this was a lie Crane was telling the world. Schrader says straight out that he does not
believe that Hollywood makes people evil; he
believes evil people come to Hollywood
because it allows them to be evil.
“Evil” is his word. The first
thing that ran through my head when I heard this was, “You’ve worked in Hollywood for
decades. What does this say about
you?” Schrader’s later comments about
how the actresses appearing nude in the film were “not real actresses” and his
strong implication that they were basically sluts and whores for doing it also
showed just where Schrader’s mind was at while making this movie. In real life Crane was not the second coming
of Pat Boone. That’s fiction that Schrader
threw in to make a bigger contrast with where Crane ended up (which is also
exaggerated.)
The story starts in 1964 with Crane as one of the most
popular radio disk jockeys in southern California . This was back when a DJ was a real personality
and was far more famous than they are today.
His agent convinces Crane to audition for the lead in a new TV comedy
about a German POW camp – Hogan’s Heroes.
Crane becomes a huge star from this.
Just as an aside – it was fun for me to see how this movie re-created
the show in a few scenes. Schrader said
in his commentary that Kinnear often would suggest changes and corrections to Schrader
during these scenes because Kinnear had made quite a study of the show. Schrader says he didn’t much care if it was
accurate or not, but he decided to humor his actor.
It’s while on this show that Crane meets John Carpenter, who
is an audio/video specialist to the stars.
He had all the latest stereo equipment, and as the film goes on, video
equipment, too. Crane had two passions
in life – playing the drums and photography.
The concept of being able to record video and not have to have it then
sent to a film lab for processing was fascinating to him. Like he says in the film, “This is the Polaroid
picture of video.”
Carpenter also introduces Crane to strip clubs and sex with
random women. Crane likes to play drums,
and this was back in the day when a live jazz band would play backing music for
the dancers, so he ends up sitting in more and more on stage playing drums for
the dancers. Carpenter and Crane became
almost inseparable as their appetite for women just increases. And there is an almost never ending supply
since female fans will throw themselves at a famous, rich, good-looking man
like Bob Crane, and Carpenter would get the overflow.
Crane’s wife catches him, of course. She snoops through his dark room and finds
the photos. She divorces him, but Crane
marries an actress from Hogan’s Heroes that he has been sleeping with
regularly. She knows what he does and
doesn’t mind…..yet.
The movie then veers into fiction again by saying that after
Hogan’s Heroes got done in 1971 Crane couldn’t find any work except for dinner
theater and that this was happening because everyone felt he was sleazy for all
the sleeping around, photographing, and videotaping he was doing. It shows how he supposedly became an enormous
public sleaze who had no filter between his brain and mouth when he saw any
woman he wanted to sleep with.
The reality is that Crane worked continuously in TV and
movies from the time Hogan’s Heroes ended in 1971 up until his murder in
1978. IMDB shows 17 different credits in
that seven year span, including his own TV show in 1975. In addition, while the people who knew him
were well aware of his activities when not working, it was not common knowledge
across the industry. He certainly hit on
every female interviewer he was attracted to (this was the non-politically
correct 1970s), but he didn’t just say crude things about random women in the
audiences of shows he was on, as the movie tries to show. That didn’t fit Schrader’s narrative, though,
so he changed it. Just as the opening public
piousness is exaggerated, so is the ending public sleaziness.
By the time of his murder Crane was going through a nasty
divorce from his second wife because of his womanizing, he and Carpenter were
starting to fight with each other, and Crane was carrying on an affair with his
dinner theater co-star, who was in a relationship with another man. The movie does not show who murdered him, but
it points the finger. The film’s not
really about the murder, though, despite being based on the Robert Graysmith
book The Murder of Bob Crane. It’s not a
murder mystery or whodunit. As Schrader
says, he was much more interested in showing how a man that pretended to be
good was actually nothing like he was pretending to be.
Kinnear does a great job in the role, especially in resisting
Schrader’s lack of focus in multiple areas.
If it were not for the subject matter he probably would have gotten
consideration for an Oscar nomination. So,
too, does Willem Dafoe do a good job as Crane’s only friend who is a
combination of hanger on, lackey, buddy, and fellow enthusiast.
I mentioned there was a documentary on the DVD. It looks like it might have been an episode
of a TV show that delved into unsolved murders.
As I came to find out from this (and from then reading more later), the
story that the police pretty much knew who did it, but didn’t bother to
prosecute because of a distaste for Crane’s lifestyle, was not correct. In reality, they feel they know who did it despite
the fact that there was almost no evidence pointing to the person, and what
little they did have was completely circumstantial. In addition, it was practically the Keystone
Cops at the crime scene where they completely contaminated it, didn’t bother to
collect some evidence, lost other evidence, and brought in a coroner who
couldn’t even determine an approximate time of death. When they finally got a new DA, he did
prosecute the suspect, but even I could have successfully defended this person
from the charges. The person was found
not guilty and died a few years later.
To this day the case is officially unsolved, but the police there still
insist it was the person they tried and seem oblivious to the fact that wanting
it to be that person, to the point of not even bothering to look at anyone
else, does not actually make that person the true killer.
This is good extra content on the DVD, if you are interested
after seeing the movie in learning more (like I was.) The film itself does not shy away from
Crane’s extra-curricular activities. It
initially got an NC-17 rating for a simulated oral sex scene. Schrader blurred it out in the film (it’s
very noticeable) in order to get an R rating.
If human sexuality in a movie makes you uncomfortable then you will
probably want to avoid this movie. Of
course, nowadays just about every person who’s even mildly exhibitionist (which
includes most of Hollywood )
has either taken nude selfies or filmed themselves having sex. A couple of years ago dozens of actresses who
were foolish enough to buy Apple products discovered that the crappy Cloud
security had allowed people to download their photos and videos – ones just
like what we see in this film. If you
think about it, Crane was really just an early adopter for an activity that is
far more common today. So, if seeing
this kind of activity in a movie would not bother you, or at least not bother
you to the point of ruining the movie for you, then I recommend you give Auto
Focus a try.
Chip’s Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
For me, this is more or less a character study of a couple of significantly flawed individuals. While Crane's descent into a bizarre sexual addiction is fictionalized here, I think there's some truth underlying that version of the narrative. I remember Crane's murder as well, and then the weird allegations that came out afterward, and how odd that seemed compared to the guy we saw on television.
ReplyDeleteI like Dafoe in this a lot. Dafoe has always been able to do creepy well, and here it's no less creepy than he often is, but it's of a different sort, or at least focused in a different way.
Both Kinnear and Dafoe could have been considered for Oscars in a less prudish world. For as much as Hollywood likes to show and talk about sex, it's remarkably unwilling to reward it much come Oscar time.
Dafoe is usually "menacing creepy", sometimes even without trying, but in this one he's more "needy creepy", so he did impress me.
DeleteI agree that the Oscars shy away from characters who enjoy sex. I went back through the nominees for Actor and Actress back to 2000 and none of them really played a role like that. Geoffrey Rush in Quills played the Marquis de Sade, but the movie is about censorship and freedom of expression, not sex. Peter O'Toole plays a "dirty old man" in Venus, but not one anyone has to worry about. DiCaprio's character in The Wolf of Wall Street may be the most amoral one I could find, but even then it was much more about the money and drugs than it was about sex.
As for the women, Jennifer Lawrence's character is referred to as a "slut" many times in Silver Linings Playbook but she never actually does anything in the movie and she's "trying to get better". Joan Allen's character in The Candidate has to defend herself for appearing on video having sex, but the movie completely wipes that away. Charlize Theron in Monster is a prostitute, but she certainly does not enjoy having sex with the johns. Diane Lane in Unfaithful may come the closest since she has hot sex while cheating on her husband, but even there she learns An Important Lesson.
Love review Chip, as usual. I really enjoyed this film. It was definitely underrated. It was a very interesting take on a sex addiction. It seems like in 2002 sex addiction still wasn't widely accepted as an addiction so in some ways this film was ahead of its time.
ReplyDeleteThanks.
DeleteThis may disappoint you, but I don't believe in sex addiction. Everybody likes sex. We're supposed to otherwise our species would have died out a long time ago.