After the last month and a half of not really watching movies
I got back into it in September. I saw 68
new films, plus re-watched Season 7 of the TV show Castle.
I refocused on the Empire Top 500 Movies list and completed
that during the month. I also discovered
that even though I had completed the original Entertainment Weekly Top 100
Films list from 1999 they had published a new one in 2013. It was quite a bit different, but as it turns
out there was only one film on it that I had not yet seen, so I took care of
that this month, too.
With the Empire list done I didn’t have a strong feeling for
what I should work on next. I did have an
unsatisfied feeling of having left some lists undone when I put them on hold to
concentrate on the TSPDT list last year.
Those were the list of all Oscar Best Picture nominees, as well as the
six genre specific lists of 101 Movies You Must See Before You Die, which were
put out by the same folks that did the 1001 Movies books.
I have a consolidated list of all films left across all my
uncompleted lists so I used that as a guide.
I first watched films that were on both the Oscars and 101 lists (as
well as others). From there I felt more
like doing Oscar films so I watched those, at first starting with the ones also
on multiple lists, but then moving back to doing it by decade.
When I had left off I had worked my way backwards in time having
seen all nominees from the present to the mid 1940s. There were a dozen or so left to finish off
the 1940s, as well as a handful to finish off the 1920s. I did knock off the 1920s, but did not quite
finish the 1940s. I discovered a few
days before the end of the month that I had 16 films expiring from my Netflix
Instant queue on October 1st, so I watched a bunch of those instead.
As of this writing I now have 35 Oscar Best Picture nominees
left to see, all of them from the years 1930 through 1940. Technically, I will not be able to complete
this list since one of the nominated films is presumed to be lost (The Patriot)
and another exists as a single copy in the UCLA Archives (White Parade), but I
will consider myself done when those are the only ones I have remaining. I may or may not knock those 33 off in
October. The new 1,001 Movies book has come out and I have already seen the ten new films added to it, so I will not
have to take any time on that.
In regards to the 101 lists, I haven’t completely set those
aside again. I am getting movies for
them one at a time via Netflix while I have been watching the Oscar nominees. I have 128 of these left to see across the
six genres (12 Action, 18 Cult, 29 Gangster, 27 Horror, 16 Sci-Fi, and 26 War).
Because of the fact that so many of the films I watched this
month were on multiple lists it might get complicated if I try to name them
all. I will place the movies only under
a single category, but know that many were also on the N.Y. Times list of the 1,000 best movies ever made, were former entries in the TSPDT list, were on
lists of the best British films, or were on the U.S. National Film Registry of movies to be preserved forever.
Here are the 68 films I saw in September. Ones I would recommend (give at least a three
star rating to) are highlighted.
Empire (22):
Sunday Bloody Sunday (1971), Brighton
Rock (1947), Hellzapoppin’
(1941), The Return
(2003), Love and Death (1975), Jailhouse Rock (1957), Bad Taste (1987), In the
Company of Men (1997), The Addiction (1995), Radio Days (1987), Unfaithfully Yours (1948), Bugsy Malone (1976), The Great Silence
(1968), Danger: Diabolik
(1968), Electra Glide in Blue (1973), Enduring Love (2004), Flesh
(1968), Le Doulos (1962), Lords of Dogtown (2005), Together (2000), Two Days in Paris (2007), Hairspray (1988)
Oscar (19): The Racket (1928), Dead End (1937), The Lives of a Bengal
Lancer (1935),
Disraeli
(1929), The Little
Foxes (1941), Love Affair (1939), The More the Merrier (1943), The Private Life of
Henry VIII (1933), State Fair (1933), The Song of Bernadette (1943), The Human
Comedy (1943), Blossoms in
the Dust (1941), One Foot in Heaven (1941), In Old Arizona (1929),
Wilson (1944), The Pied
Piper (1942), Wake Island (1942), For Whom the Bell Tolls (1943), The
Hollywood Revue of 1929 (1929)
101 Genre (4):
The Tenth Victim (1965), The
Enforcer (1951), The
Three Musketeers (1948), The Getaway (1972)
EW (1): A Face in the Crowd (1957)
Other (22): Frozen Fever (2015), Muppets Most Wanted (2014),
Two Night Stand (2014),
Laggies (2014),
Ghosts of Girlfriends Past (2009), Tusk (2014), The
Train (1964), Sabotage
(2014), Jack Ryan:
Shadow Recruit (2014), Into the Storm (2014), Life After Beth (2014), Furious Seven (2015),
What Price Fleadom (1948), Need for Speed (2014), Pixels (2015), Fantastic Four (2015), What We Do in the Shadows (2015),
Noah (2014), David Ortiz: In the Moment
(2014), Go West
(1925), G.I. Joe: Retaliation (2013), Thanks for Sharing (2012)
Sunday Bloody Sunday
(1971) – If I'm going to watch a
film from a list I try to go in with as little info as possible in order to be
able to enjoy it more. In this case that may have backfired on me. Based solely
on the title I had always thought this film dealt with the Bloody Sunday events
so I went into it expecting to see that. Instead it's a quiet little character
piece. Through no fault of the film this put a knock against it
with me. In regards to the film
itself, I'm sure it must have been quite shocking at the time with its
depiction not only of casual sex, but a gay man and a straight woman both
civilly sharing a younger bisexual man as a lover. It's no longer 1971, though,
so the content of the film now isn't really that startling. It's just sort
of there. 2.5 stars
Hellzapoppin’ (1941)
– Well that was different. Or
rather, that was kind of familiar, except decades ahead of its time. While
watching this 1941 movie you get to see gags later done in Blazing Saddles
(running across movie sets), Airplane ("do you mind if I take a
picture"), and Mystery Science Theater 3000 (commenting on the movie being
shown) - all at the same time. It has a water ballet sequence years before
Esther Williams' films made them popular. It also spoofs many films of the day,
most pointedly Philadelphia Story, with gags thrown in for Citizen Kane and
many others. I'll be honest, I've
only vaguely heard of Ole Olesen and Chic Johnson - the stars of this movie.
They seem to not be as well remembered as Abbot and Costello, Laurel and Hardy, and similar comedy duos of
that day. This movie is kind of a
mess, with more gags per minute than Airplane, but unlike Airplane with them
missing more than hitting. It has scenes that not only break the fourth wall,
but completely demolish them, especially the characters interacting with the
projectionist in the booth that is supposedly showing us this movie. If you like slapstick then this may be the
best example ever made. 3 stars
The Return (2003) –
The title refers to the return of a
father that two boys have never met. (It's hinted that he's been in prison.) He
takes them on an outing to a remote island, obviously to do something for
himself, and the boys happen to be along. While he will not win any father of
the year awards, the younger brother makes him look like a saint for putting up
with him. God, the younger son was annoying. One note - don't expect to have answers to
all your questions when the film ends.
3.5 stars
Love and Death (1975)
– This was my second movie of
the day with a gag every few seconds, and with most of them missing the mark.
In this case Woody Allen does his best Bob Hope impersonation as he parodies
both Russian literature and Bergman films. 2 stars
Jailhouse Rock (1957)
– Believe it or not, this is the
first Elvis movie I'd ever seen. I was a little surprised it was a
straightforward drama with the songs as part of his character performing. I
figured it would be a more lightweight musical comedy. In fact, Elvis'
character is pretty much a tremendous dick to everyone he meets - so much for
making him likable for audiences.
Regardless, there are two main reasons to see this film: 1. Elvis
Presley's singing; 2. Co-star Judy Tyler's beauty, especially when smiling,
which she does a lot. 3 stars
Bad Taste (1987) –
An obvious amateur effort - (“hey
guys, wanna make a movie with guns and aliens and gore?") - that would be
long forgotten if it wasn't the first film from Peter Jackson. Somehow this
turned up on the Empire Top 500 films list so I watched it. If you would have
told me that someday the guy who wrote and directed this would adapt and direct
The Lord of the Rings I would have thought you were nuts. It gets a rating this
high because I laughed at a few of the jokes. 1.5 stars
In the Company of Men
(1997) – This is an unpleasant
movie about two assholes. Both have recently been screwed over by women so the
alpha-asshole comes up with an idea for both of them to court the same woman,
get her to have feelings for them, then to dump her to get their revenge. The
beta-asshole isn't really into it, but goes along. When it becomes clear that
beta-asshole is alpha-asshole's boss, and that alpha-asshole isn't just a
misogynist, but a sociopath, it becomes clear what alpha-asshole's real plan
is. From there it's just letting the film play out until it gets to the "reveal". While looking through their IMDB credits I
was amazed to find that writer/director Neil Labute and star Aaron Eckhart
later teamed up again for 2002's Possession - a very romantic film that I
highly recommend. 2 stars
The Addiction (1995)
– I don't think the world was
crying out for an urban vampire movie filled with philosophical babble on the
nature of both evil and addiction, but here it is. In the world of this movie, being turned into
a vampire apparently not only infuses them with a need for blood, but also with
a knowledge of all the great philosophers, as well as a compulsion to talk
about them endlessly. Not being a big fan of philosophy made this aspect of the
film irritating after a while. It
would be worth watching this again, though, if it was with a huge Twilight fan
just so I could see her brain get fried.
2 stars
Radio Days (1987) –
In a lot of ways this reminds me of
another nostalgic 1987 movie about the early 1940s - Hope and Glory. I'd rate
that film a little higher, but Radio Days is definitely
worth watching. 3.5 stars
Unfaithfully Yours
(1948) – This is a nasty little
piece of dark comedy from Preston Sturges. Rex Harrison's screen persona of
being quick to anger is put to good use here. And hopefully without spoiling anything,
this movie actually had me going for a while with something that occurred on
screen. It's been a while since that has happened. 3.5 stars
Bugsy Malone (1976) –
This is a period American gangster
film...written and made in the U.K. by an Englishman...that's also a
musical...starring an entire cast of 12-14 year olds (including
Jodie Foster). When you read the prior sentence you either had a
"that's stupid" reaction or a "that sounds weird enough that I
want to see it" reaction. If it's the latter then I think you might
enjoy it. Don't expect much in the way of acting. And the kids aren't
actually singing, but are lipsynching to pre-recorded adult singers. All the
dialogue is right out of a 1930s gangster film. 3 stars
The Great Silence
(1968) – Jean Louis Trintignant
and Klaus Kinski once starred together in a spaghetti western?
Yes indeed. I wondered the entire
movie why Trintignant's character was mute since they dubbed over all the other
foreign accents anyway. If the trivia on IMDB is to be believed, he simply
didn't feel like learning any lines, so they changed the character to be a
mute. Talk about star power.
Despite the big names, the biggest reason to see this film is the
location shooting in the Pyrenees . 2.5 stars
Frozen Fever (2015) –
Cute follow-up to the movie. The
song is a little generic, but it's the antics with the mini snowmen that are
the reason to watch. 3.5 stars
Danger: Diabolik
(1968) – This movie is very much
a product of the "swinging 60s". It's clearly inspired by the Batman
TV show and the Flint
movies, which were themselves semi-parodies of the James Bond movies. 3 stars
Electra Glide in Blue
(1973) – aka Easy Rider 2: The
Hippies Strike Back. The movie
opens by practically fetishizing the lead cop as he goes from underwear, to
slowly strapping on the leather outfit of a highway motorcycle cop. Most of the
movie is rather pedestrian, except for the ending. 2.5 stars
Enduring Love (2004)
– Other than the fact that it
was a recent (at the time) British film starring Daniel Craig before he became
Bond I have no idea how this made the 2008 Empire Top 500 list. It's an
ordinary plot about a psycho who obsesses over someone and brings ruin to his
life. It even sets it up for a sequel at the end. And the sound mix is so poor
that the score periodically drowns out the dialogue. 2 stars
Flesh (1968) – The flesh referred to in the title is that
of Joe Dallesandro, the star. He has multiple long, extended (yes that's a pun)
scenes that show everything including full frontal erections. And that pretty much sums up the movie. The
editing is poor, the dialogue and acting even worse. I watched it because it
somehow made Empire's list of the Top 500 films of all time. If you like seeing man flesh, and lots of it,
then by all means watch this. Anyone else should skip it. 1 star
Le Doulos (1962) –
Had this been the first Melville
film I had ever seen I think I would have liked it more. As it was, this is the
umpteenth Melville police/crime drama I've watched and I've gotten a little
tired of them. I can't really fault the film, and there are the famous long
shots with no edits for several minutes, but overall it just didn't
grab me. 2.5 stars
Lords of Dogtown
(2005) – A bunch of great
skateboarding scenes interrupted by long periods where the film tries to be
Dazed and Confused. If you watch it, do it for the skateboarding. 2.5 stars
Muppets Most Wanted
(2014) – I didn't watch this
right away because it didn't get very good word of mouth. That was a mistake. I
liked it almost as much as the prior one. It had a lot of good gags in it, some
of the songs were good, and there were a ton of cameos. My favorite was
Christoph Waltz playing himself as part of the Muppets' review when they were
in Berlin .
What do you have Christoph Waltz do for entertainment? Why the waltz,
of course. A close runner up would
be Usher as, what else, a wedding usher.
4 stars
Two Night Stand
(2014) – Above average romantic
comedy/drama with Miles Teller and Analeigh Tipton. It reminded me just a
little of Friends with Benefits and Room in Rome . Tipton has shown before she can do
adorable and she puts that to good use here. Teller, however, has been an
asshole in every movie I've seen him in until now. It was interesting to see
him be something else. 3.5 stars
Laggies (2014) – It's not as good as director Lynn
Shelton's earlier movie Your Sister's Sister, but it still has some three
dimensional characters in it. Just
a heads up - Knightley's character will probably be unlikable to some of the viewers. 3 stars
Together (2000) –
It took a while for me to get into
this film (close to an hour), but I finally came around. What helped is that
the characters that had seemed to spend the entire movie up to that point
yelling had now left the house.
This is certainly a kinder movie that the director's film Lilja-4-Ever,
but nowhere near as good as his earlier movie Fucking Amal (aka Show Me Love).
Since this film appeared two years between the other two I can easily see it as
a bridge from Fucking Amal to Lilja-4-Ever in terms of tone. 3 stars
Under the Skin (2013)
– A few months back I used
Letterboxd to build a list of the most popular film of each year that I had not yet seen. Under the Skin was the one for 2013. Let's be honest, though - the reason
this movie is so popular is because of Scarlett Johansson doing nude scenes
in it. First, the positive: there
are a lot of interesting visuals in the film, and no, that's not a reference to
Johansson. In fact, all of her nude scenes are poorly lit. That makes them
more "artistic". Second,
the somewhat negative: this is a slow moving film. It's the kind of movie where
the director spends 2 minutes showing someone walk down a flight of stairs...and...very...carefully...step...on...
each...one...and...
then...very...carefully...step...down...to...the...next...one...and...then...
(you get the idea). Now slow moving can be fine, except that the scenes in this
film are heavily repetitive. A sizable chunk of the movie consists of Johansson
driving around and asking for directions.
Third, the big negative: the score is extremely annoying. I mean
seriously fucking annoying. I finally just hit mute and turned the subtitles on
to get away from the sound. 2
stars
Two Days in Paris (2007) – This is a movie about two unpleasant people having an unpleasant time in Paris . It's Before
Sunrise if the guy had spent the entire movie complaining, while the woman had
spent the entire movie getting into fights with people, except when she was
lying to them or flirting with them. Apparently there was a sequel, but I don't
think I'll be watching it. I did laugh at a few of the jokes in this film so I
didn't completely dislike it. 2.5
stars
Hairspray (1988) –
It was interesting seeing the
original version after having seen the musical version multiple times. It was
also interesting seeing John Waters make a PG rated film (although the prudes
at the MPAA would probably give it a PG-13 if it came out today.) Some of the kids looked vaguely familiar and
when looking them up afterwards I found out that Amber was played by the future
singer Vitamin C and Link, the guy that looked like Elvis, had ended up playing
Elvis in no less than 4 other movies and TV shows. As for comparing the two movies, they are
their own films, concentrating on different things, but with the same
overriding concept of a local teen music show. I do prefer the 2007 musical
version, simply because it's more fun, but I also like the original. 3 stars
Ghosts of Girlfriends
Past – The message of this film
is that if you don't marry a woman even though she's psychotic, prone to
outbursts, emotionally blackmails people, and constantly has crying jags then
you will end up a lonely bitter old man. And those are just the supporting
characters. The main character games women and is condemned for it, yet he
himself is being gamed even better by a woman and that is celebrated as all
that is truly wonderful. Other than
Emma Stone, who stole every scene she was in, and Anne Archer, who was still
looking damn good for being in her early 60s, there's not much reason to
watch this. 2 stars
Tusk (2014) – I'm not even going to attempt to describe
this, except to say I can understand if a lot of people hate it simply for the
bizarre concept. It does have some
problems, especially the second half which bogged down and should have been cut
down quite a bit. I think I know why it wasn't though - Johnny Depp. Honest to
God, I had no clue that was Depp playing the farcical Quebec police inspector until I read the
cast list on IMDB afterwards. It makes sense that Smith would leave all of
Depp's weirdness on screen, even when it detracts from the
overall movie. Michael Parks is
great in this, though, and Justin Long should get a medal just for putting up
with what he had to onscreen. 3
stars
The Racket (1928) –
Above average gangster film that
received a Best Production (what we now call Best Picture) nomination in the
first year of the Oscars. It's also on the 101 Gangster Movies You Must See
Before You Die list. None of the
stars lasted much beyond the start of the sound era, but in this silent film
they do a good job. The story is more complex than I expected, too. 3 stars
Dead End (1937) –
Dead End was a Best Picture nominee
and it's on two other lists of movies I have. There are three intertwining
stories, the best being Humphrey Bogart's gangster who learns you can't go
home again. Unfortunately, someone
thought it would be a good idea to include a bunch of street kids who are about
as annoying as they could possibly be. The fact that none of them could act
worth a damn made their scenes even worse. I could have used far less of them
on screen and more of Bogart. The
third story is that of a star crossed set of lovers who both want a better
life, but who may not be able to get out of the poor neighborhood they have
grown up in. There is social
commentary in the film - a surprise for the time in that it puts forth the idea
that poverty and no hope are the causes of crime more so than someone just
being innately evil. Finally, I was
impressed by the large, multi-story tenement and street set and the way the
camera used all parts of it. 3
stars
The Train (1964) –
This was this month’s Steve’s Selection.
You can read my review of it here.
4 stars
The Lives of a Bengal Lancer (1935) – Another Best Picture nominee that's also on
multiple other movie lists. It's got some good action sequences in it. Gary
Cooper's character is exciting on screen, but if you stop to think about his
actions he makes a pretty piss poor officer. 3.5 stars
Disraeli (1929) –
It earned star George Arliss a Best
Acting Oscar. It appears this was
his role and no one else's. He not only starred as British Prime Minister
Benjamin Disraeli in an earlier silent film, but also in three separate
stage productions. This version is
a talkie, but obviously an early one. The sound quality is not the greatest and
we still get a number of establishing title cards onscreen. And the stage
origins are obvious both from the fact that anything happening outside a couple
locations is simply described by reading notes from those who are offscreen,
and from Arliss' acting style, which is very "stagey". The reason to watch this film is Arliss
playing a smart man who tries, and usually succeeds, to be one step ahead of
his enemies. 3 stars
Sabotage (2014) –
Decent mystery/action flick with Arnold in it. It actually
has a story and it could be considered more a mystery with some gunfights in
it, rather than an action film.
Some DEA agents, led by Arnold ,
steal 10 million out of hundreds of millions of cash from a drug cartel, but
someone gets to the hidden money before they do. It's not long before someone
starts picking them off, one by one. It's interesting in that the movie
presents the question of whether Arnold
is the bad guy or not. 3 stars
Jack Ryan: Shadow
Recruit (2014) – Decent reboot
of the Jack Ryan franchise (just don't analyze the plot too much), although I
understand this didn't do enough box office to warrant a sequel. Pine is
serviceable as Ryan, but there will only ever be one real Jack Ryan -
Alec Baldwin. 3 stars
The Little Foxes
(1941) – Best Picture nominee
about a horrible family in the deep South in 1900. Three siblings have taken
advantage of and ripped off pretty much everyone they can, with the worst being
the sister played by Bette Davis. Those that married into the family, and Davis ' daughter, manage
to be okay, but often overwhelmed by the evil around them. It's the
performances that make this worth seeing.
3 stars
Love Affair (1939) –
An Affair to Remember is practically
a scene by scene remake of this. I saw it first, so watching this was not as
entertaining. It's only fair I give the two films the same
rating, though. 2.5 stars
The More the Merrier
(1943) – This Best Picture
nominee is a really fun film. During WWII housing shortages were so bad in Washington , D.C.
that people shared apartments. An older man takes half of a single woman's
place, but then turns around and rents half of his half to a handsome soldier
and proceeds to play matchmaker between the two. This film features a very sexy scene for the
time, and it also shows off just how great Jean Arthur looked at 43. (She was
very believably playing a character in her 20s.) 4 stars
The Private Life of
Henry VIII (1933) – There are
better films about this king, even though Charles Laughton plays the title
role. He won an acting Oscar for it, too. The problem is the movie just isn't
very good. It crams five of his marriages into 90 minutes and none of them are
that interesting. The best is Elsa Lanchester as Anne of Cleves (#4), although
the portrayal is probably all fiction.
2 stars
State Fair (1933) –
This is the original, non-musical
version of the story of a family going to the Iowa State Fair. It was made before
the Code was being enforced so let's just say that the son has a REALLY good
time there after he meets a trapeze artist. The daughter also finds romance,
but of course she's not allowed to have sex. Three guesses which of the two
actually ends up with the object of their affection. 2.5 stars
The Tenth Victim
(1965) – Interesting concept (at
some future point people sign up to try to kill each other, alternating between
hunter and victim), but not very well executed (pun intended). I'm surprised I had
never heard of this, considering it's a science fiction film starring Marcello
Mastroianni and Ursula Andress. No attempt is made to disguise the fact that it
was the 1960s. In fact, the entire film just screams it, from the clothes, to
the hair, to the cars, to the phones, to everything. The ending is kind of a mess, as if they
couldn't figure out what they wanted to happen and they just filmed anything
that came to mind. 2.5 stars
Into the Storm (2014)
– The movie starts out for the
first 30 minutes or so introducing us to a whole bunch of people apparently so
we will identify with them and then worry in the tornado scenes if they will
live or die. The problem is that they are pretty much all totally unlikable so
if anything I was hoping to see them get sucked up into a
funnel cloud. This appears to have
been Richard Armitage's attempt to spin the Hobbit stardom into more roles.
After seeing this I think he needs to fire his agent. 2 stars
Life After Beth
(2014) – This is a zombie
comedy, but unlike Shaun of the Dead, Zombieland, and Warm Bodies this one
isn't really funny at all. Oh, it tries, but it doesn't ever
really succeed. 2 stars
The Enforcer (1951) –
This is a police procedural with
Bogart as an Assistant DA going back over the events of the case in a desperate
attempt to find something new after his only witness dies. We see flashbacks
within flashbacks as we learn what led to this. I was kind of surprised that this movie
presented the concept that murder for hire was something completely unknown to
the cops and that it had not even existed until the main bad guy came up with
the idea. I suppose it's needed for the narrative. There's some good tension in places. 3.5 stars
Furious Seven (2015)
– This has completely insane,
over the top action stunts in it....and they're great. Shut your brain off and
have fun with them. There's also a
nice tribute to Paul Walker at the end.
4 stars
The Song of
Bernadette (1943) – The movie
starts right away on a low note. It has an opening statement that for those
that believe the story then no explanation is needed, while for those who do
not believe then no explanation is possible. My immediate reaction to that was
"Then why make the damn movie?" When I got done watching it two and a
half hours later I had the same question.
Don't watch this hoping for anything resembling subtlety or
evenhandedness. This is a full blown “music swelling every time the chosen one
speaks" kind of movie. 2
stars
The Human Comedy
(1943) – This is an occasionally
preachy, very saccharine, slice of life ensemble melodrama made during WWII. I
have no clue how it got a Best Picture nomination, let alone won the Oscar for
Best Original Writing. It had to be the crappy times people were going through
that made this movie have the impact it did. 2 stars
The Three Musketeers
(1948) – During the action
sequences this film buckles its swash with the best of them. Unfortunately, for
the first half of the movie they have the actors, especially Gene Kelly, play
their roles so broadly that they are practically a parody. The movie gets more
serious as it goes along, but I could never quite forget the goofiness of the
first half. 3 stars
What Price Fleadom
(1948) – This is a Warner Brothers animated short that was on the DVD of
The Three Musketeers. It doesn’t have
any of the familiar characters and it’s not really that funny. 2.5 stars
Blossoms in the Dust
(1941) – I'm surprised this Best
Picture nominee isn't better known. I had never heard of it myself and it's
apparently never been released on DVD.
Greer Garson has a good role as a real woman who found homes for
abandoned children in Texas
in the early part of the 20th century. She also fought the bigotry against
"illegitimate" children.
3.5 stars
One Foot in Heaven
(1941) – This is the story of a
man who screws his wife over again and again and again. Oh, that's not what the
studio intended - it's the simple, mundane story of a minister that we're
supposed to walk away with. The problem
is they chose to make him one who cares nothing about what his wife's hopes and
dreams may be, even going so far as to give his word on the naming of their
child - a minister's word - and then going back on it to do exactly what he
wanted to do. 2.5 stars
A Face in the Crowd (1957)
– This film is a combination of
Meet John Doe (1941) and All the King's Men (1949). It's obviously heavily
influenced by the McCarthy hearings, especially where the director and
screenwriter both named names. The latter fact also explains the lack of any
Oscar nominations. At the very least Andy Griffith should have received one for
Best Actor and Kazan for Best Director.
The film does overstay its welcome just a little. It makes its point,
but then decides to make it two more times. It could have been tightened up by
10 minutes or so. And it is just a
little self-serving for a movie director to make a film about the dangers of
the (then) new TV explosion and the cults of personality that were springing up
around the performers, especially considering how movies were losing a lot of
ticket sales to the new entertainment medium. 3.5 stars
In Old Arizona (1929) – This Best Picture nominee (and Best Actor
winner) is a very early all sound movie. Much like directors of 3D films today
throw in pointless things purely for the 3D effect, this film throws in many
quick scenes purely for the sound - frying bacon, a blacksmith's anvil, etc.
Considering they shot a lot of it outdoors, though, it's pretty impressive that
they were able to record sound as well as they did. The acting is typical of the period (i.e.
playing to the back row of the theater.) Overall, this movie was
just okay. 2.5 stars
Need for Speed (2014)
– This is car porn, pure and
simple. It's got sports cars, muscle cars, and supercars. It's got scenes from
The Fast and the Furious, The Gumball Rally, Death Race 2000, Gone in 60
Seconds, Thelma and Louise, and Vanishing Point. In regards to the last one,
Michael Keaton mimics the DJ talking to the driver. I'll bet of the 2014 films
Keaton did he hopes everyone remembers Birdman and forgets this one
and Robocop. Need for Speed doesn't
even bother trying to come up with a coherent story; it's just the weakest
possible excuse to string the driving scenes together. And at more than 2
hours, it's 30 minutes too long for the kind of film it is. All in all, if you watch it then do it for
the cars, not for anything else.
2.5 stars
The Pied Piper (1942)
– This is an interesting little
film about an older Englishman trying to get some kids safely out of France and
into England just as the Nazis invade France in 1940. The reason to see it is the star - Monty
Woolley. In addition, director (of other films) Otto Preminger makes his acting
debut in this movie in a small, but important role. 3 stars
Wake Island (1942) –
This is an early WWII film about the
taking of Wake Island by the Japanese. The
movie is pretty much complete hokum, spending lots of time on the hijinks of
two privates trying to be Abbott and Costello, as well as changing the ending
from the real life Marines surrendering after the first attack to one where
they held out for weeks and fought to the last man. I'm sure a movie accurately
showing them surrendering didn't fit the War Department's propaganda machine
and Hollywood
was happy to comply. 2 stars
The Getaway (1972) –
For a film titled "The
Getaway" there were an awful lot of slow sections in it where not much
happened, especially the first 25 minutes. 2.5 stars
Pixels (2015) – I had heard all the horrible reviews. I
was hoping that my own nostalgia from having played all these games in arcades
as a kid would help me like the film whereas people too young to have ever
experienced them would not. You know what? It almost did. Ultimately, the film
suffered from having not enough Peter Dinklage and WAY too much
Kevin James. Most of the best jokes
were already shown in the trailers. There is a great callback joke at the very
end with Dinklage's character, though, that made me laugh quite
a bit. 2.5 stars
Fantastic Four (2015) – This is hardly the pile of crap I'd heard it was.
Its crime appears to be that it is not what people have come to expect from a
superhero movie. There are no quips or jokes or lighthearted moments. There is
one big action sequence, but that's it. What this film is, is a very serious
take on what it would mean if this happened to these people. It's not a
"cool, we've got superpowers!" kind of movie. And in fact, this film
functions mostly as an origin story that is really introducing the characters
for the next film. It didn't
surprise me to learn afterwards that the studio took over the film and cut
major sections out of it. It was obvious while watching that there were missing
scenes. My biggest complaint with the
film is that they cast a bunch of people in their late 20s and early 30s to
play high school kids. There's no reason to make the characters that young. In
fact, it makes what they are doing (working on a government project) much less
believable. They should have made them college grad students. Overall, you can at least say that this is
better than any of the Fantastic Four movies that have come
before it. 3 stars
What We Do in the Shadows (2015) – This is an amusing mockumentary very much
in the style of Man Bites Dog (1992). In this case, instead of following a
serial killer around the "documentary crew" are following vampires.
Anyone who liked Man Bites Dog should see this, and vice-versa. The humor is not the laugh uproariously kind,
but rather the "lot of little funny moments" kind. An example is when
the vampires meet a group of werewolves and one of the werewolves objects to a
vampire wearing fur. The first 15
to 20 minutes were the funniest to me, but that might be because that was when
the concept was the freshest. 3.5
stars
For Whom the Bell Tolls (1943) – I've never read the novel. Perhaps if I
had I would have liked this movie more. It's nearly three hours long and the
first half of that consists of people who are already at a bridge with
dynamite, fuses, etc. doing nothing but talking about blowing it up. By the
time it got to the intermission I couldn't have cared less if they blew up the
bridge or not. And I still had almost another hour and a half to go. The screenplay gives Bergman nothing to work
with. She's supposed to be this damaged character, but all she is given to do
is to stare dreamily and vacantly into Gary Cooper's eyes. For
three hours. 2 stars
The Hollywood
Revue of 1929 (1929) – This is a
curiosity from the early days of sound. It received a Best Picture nomination
despite not really being a film at all. It's a recording of what is essentially
a stage vaudeville show, but with the big name stars the studio had under
contract at the time. There is no story or plot, just some quick jokes in
between musical/dancing skits. Nowadays this would probably get classified as
a documentary. There are a couple
of reasons to see this, other than being a Best Picture nominee. One is that
you get to see several names you'll know all in one film (i.e. Buster Keaton,
Laurel and Hardy, Jack Benny). Of course, there will probably be more names you
don't recognize than those you do. The second is that this has the first
appearance of the song Singin' in the Rain in a movie. The third is that there
are two sequences where they experimented with the two strip color process, so
the scenes were not entirely black and white. Overall, though, the jokes mostly fall flat
and the condition of the film is such that both picture and sound suffer quite
a bit, hurting the enjoyment of the song and dance numbers. In addition, the
film is off center due to the way sound was originally intended to accompany
the film (on a separate disk instead of a strip on the side of the film
itself.) If this was ever restored it would be more worthwhile
to see. 2.5 stars
Noah (2014) – The key to watching this for me was to
treat it like any other epic fantasy tale like The Lord of the Rings and then
go from there. That meant things like magic potions that make animals sleep for
months, touches that instantly heal, forests that grow in seconds, and
rock-covered beings were just par for the course. Biblical purists were probably having
conniption fits over this, especially since Noah is portrayed as a man who is
not very nice at times. Like all good zealots he comes to believe that he knows
The Creator's ("God" is never mentioned) wishes and it's up to him to
see it through, even if it means murder. The film also makes no bones about the
fact that he could have saved many people, but just sat and listened to their
screams as they were dying outside his ark. This isn't one of Aronofsky's better films,
but it's worth seeing. 3 stars
David Ortiz: In the Moment (2014) - This is a very good documentary on Boston
Red Sox player David Ortiz, starting with the (then) recent World Series win in
2013 and then looking back on his family life growing up in The Dominican
Republic, as well as his earlier years in baseball with the Minnesota Twins
(who released him after he had a year with 20 home runs - oops!) and the Boston
Red Sox. 4 stars
Go West (1925) – Once again Keaton takes an idea that
Harold Lloyd did and then puts his own spin on it. There are a number of
classic Keaton moments. My favorite is when he's told at gunpoint to smile when
he calls another card player a cheater. Of course, "The Great Stone
Face" doesn't smile in his films.
I wouldn't place this anywhere near the top of the Keaton films I've
seen, but it does still entertain.
3 stars
G.I. Joe: Retaliation
(2013) – Better than the first
movie, but that's not exactly saying much. They get rid of Tatum early on and
make it Dwayne Johnson's movie, with an extended cameo from Bruce Willis. The
story is far-fetched, but there are some good sword fighting scenes, especially
one on the sides of cliffs. 2.5
stars
Thanks for Sharing
(2012) – This movie tries to
argue that A. sex addiction is real; B. that the only way to combat it is to
have plain, vanilla sex in a long term relationship; and that C. masturbation
is the downfall of men (and women).
Really. At least it does show
that this horseshit has screwed up one of the three "addicts" so
badly that he can't even have a real relationship anymore because he's afraid
to have fun sex with the woman who loves him. 2 stars
Wait, you think Pixels and the new Fantastic Four is better than Under the Skin? You make me sad.
ReplyDeletePixels and Fantastic Four didn't have a godawful annoying score in them. That cost Under the Skin a star right there.
Deletethevoid99 forgets the old saying "different strokes for different folks". Under The Skin I liked, but is not for everyone.
ReplyDeleteThe fake applause in the final scene of A Face in the Crowd (1957) felt iconic and haunted me for days afterwards. Agree Andy Griffith was terrific.
I had the same reaction to Sunday Bloody Sunday, I thought it was about the riots, and I ended up not even bothering to finish the film.
I'm glad you quite liked The Return (2003), it impressed me with its cinematography and story, and is one of the better contemporary Russian films. I liked I wasn't handed all the answers at the end.
I know you hated Bad Taste (1987). It can’t escape the look of a low budget horror film, which of course it is. I liked it more than you. The ending was pretty amazing.
Glad you had fun with What We Do in the Shadows. An above average comedy in a sea of average comedies.
Curious about The More the Merrier (1943), thanks for the recommendation!
The thing that got me about Griffith's performance is where they'd have the quiet scenes and his face would settle into this abstract look of dislike or even loathing. A good one is when he is on the train leaving the small town he got his start with.
DeleteIt's funny about the Sunday Bloody Sunday film and our expectations. I read afterwards that the Bloody Sunday events actually occurred while this film was still being shown in theaters there.
The Return definitely had a lot going for it. The fact that I still liked it that much despite the younger brat in it says something.
My reaction to Bad Taste isn't specific to that film, but to the gorehound movies in general. They hold no entertainment for me, so the fact that I actually gave it a rating higher than a single star indicates I did get something from it and that was some of the humor. There are a bunch of really bad movies from the 80s that I do like, but they are not filled with gore; they are filled with naked women. :-) Think Andy Sidaris movies...
I was kind of surprised someone hadn't made a film like What We Do in the Shadows before this. The genre is ripe for parody and abuse. If you haven't seen Man Bites Dog I recommend it.
I hope you like The More the Merrier.
This is the first chance I've had to give the sort of substantial comment this post needs, because I've seen a bunch of these.
ReplyDeleteRadio Days: I like this more than you do. It's not my favorite Woody Allen movie, but it is my favorite Woody Allen script. It's funny without being mean, and I love that it looks at that era through such heavily-tinted rose-colored glasses.
Love and Death: A Woody Allen movie I've never felt the need to rewatch. It does, however, contain one of my favorite of his lines:
Sonja: I want three children.
Boris: Yes, one of each.
Hairspray: Love it. This is the John Waters film I wish was on the 1001 Movies list.
Dead End: Three stars is about right. Interesting as a proto-noir, and of course Bogart is always great when he plays a thug.
The Lives of a Bengal Lancer: There's a scene in this where Colonel Stone tries to tell his officers about his son and he just can't get the bat off his shoulder and actually show emotion. It's such a great and unexpected scene that it boosted my rating for this by at least half a star.
Disraeli: Interesting, and George Arliss is definitely the reason to see it. He has a lot of fun with this role.
The Little Foxes: Ugly characters, great performances. Beautifully shot.
Love Affair: An Affair to Remember is far better, and I only kind of like that, so...
The Private Live of Henry VIII: I agree completely with everything you say here. Hard not to like Laughton and Elsa Lanchester on screen together, though.
State Fair: A complete non-entity of a film. I wasn't precisely bored, but I wasn't interested in it while it was on, either. I remember almost none of it.
The Song of Bernadette: Two stars is very generous of you for what is essentially a 158 minute slog through molasses sweetened liberally with Jesus magic. Jennifer Jones got her acting direction here from a lead pipe. Ick.
One Foot in Heaven: Take 60 seconds--can you think of a more self-righteous ass of a main character who doesn't get a comeuppance by the film's end? I can't, and I've been trying to think of one for a lot longer than 60 seconds.
In Old Arizona: It's all about Warner Baxter, who's having a great time in the role. Otherwise, it's interesting for (as you say) technical issues.
The Pied Piper: Both too long and not long enough. There's a story here, but the film doesn't quite tell it, and what it does tell it takes too long to do.
Wake Island: I like it a little more than you. Taking into consideration that this was a propaganda film, the changes in history were understandable, at least as a product of the times.
The Hollywood Revue of 1929: Interesting as a showcase, as a sort of "Vaudeville on film" idea, but not much of an actual film. Still, it's nice to see a Laurel and Hardy routine.
The Train: Damn right!
Missed one!
DeleteThe More the Merrier: It's fluff, but wildly entertaining, and Charles Coburn is fantastic in it. In fact, the second act is weaker than the other two because he's not in it as much. I'd love to see a movie about Benjamin Dingle.
And yes, Jean Arthur looked great for 43.
Thanks for the comments on all the movies. I did go back and read your reviews of the Oscar Best Picture nominees that I had not seen at the time you posted them. It was interesting that we usually had the same general reaction to most of them.
DeleteI'm pretty disappointed that you didn't get into Under the Skin...that was one of my favorites of that year!
ReplyDeleteI was looking forward to it, and as I said in my mini-review, it had a lot of great visuals in it, but a film that actively annoys me via a grating score is not one that is going to get a recommendation (at least 3 stars) from me. I liked it better once I hit mute and put the subtitles on, but how can I recommend a movie where I had to do that?
Delete