This is the sixth of twelve films that Steve at 1001plus has
picked for me to watch and review. It’s
the first of two horror films he gave me.
Steve is a bigger fan of horror than I am. I’m sure this is one of the ones he wondered
about giving me. Well Steve, you’ve got
no worries here. This was a very
effective movie filled with plenty of goosebump inducing moments for me. While most horror films lose my attention
when they go for the gore, this one stayed restrained (for the most part – more
later) and the film has a much greater impact because of it. And it actually has more going on than just
scares. It’s three parts ghost story,
one part murder mystery, and one part political thriller.
Most every genre has something about it that requires a
greater than usual suspension of disbelief.
In action films you have to believe that the hero can survive car crashes,
recover almost instantly from injuries, and hit every person he shoots at while
never being shot himself. In musicals
you have to accept that people can break out into synchronized song. And in horror films you have to believe
people will stick around in situations where anyone with a shred of sanity
would be running for the hills. (A recent Geico commercial spoofs this and it
makes me laugh every time.) While The
Changeling does not completely do away with the latter, it does at least give a
halfway believable reason for the main character to stick around to the end,
and it is better for it.
John Russell (George C. Scott) suffers a tragedy when he
sees his wife and young daughter killed in an auto accident right in front of
him. He starts over by moving to Seattle to teach music
composition at a college. He rents a
huge mansion that has been abandoned for twelve years. It has a music room where he can put a piano
and write.
It’s not long before he’s being woken up by the entire house
reverberating like a gong, doors opening and closing on their own, windows
breaking out as if something is inside the house, etc. An old woman he meets warns him the house
“doesn’t want to be lived in.” Here’s
where people would be getting out in real life.
Instead, he looks into the history of the house. He has a strong sense something is trying to
communicate with him.
The woman who rented him the house, Claire (Trish Van Devere
– Scott’s real life wife), works for the historical society and they start digging
into the history. They find that about
70 years earlier a girl was killed in an accident not unlike the one that took
John’s daughter from him. Claire puts
him in touch with some people who perform a séance. John records it and while he didn’t hear
anything during it, while listening to the tape afterwards he can hear a
child’s voice speaking, answering the questions that were asked during the
séance. After the séance he now realizes
that this child is not the girl who was killed, but another child no one seems
to know about.
He continues to dig (at one point, literally) in order to
find out who the child is and what happened to him. It leads him to a connection to an old
Senator (Melvyn Douglas) whose family used to own the house.
It was interesting to see the way Scott played this
character. If you’re like me you tend to
picture George C. Scott as barking out words, angry, not someone to be trifled
with – ala Patton or Dr. Strangelove. In
this film he plays it quiet, intelligent, and thoughtful. He’s not meek, but he’s not someone you’d
expect to take on a ghost, either.
Let’s face it, though, you don’t watch a ghost story to see
George C. Scott give a layered performance; that’s just a bonus. No, you watch this movie for the scares and suspense. And this is where it really delivers. Much like 1963’s The Haunting, this film
provides scares with no gore, no loud musical changes, and nothing jumping out
of dark places. Instead it simply builds
a little at a time until something as simple as a child’s ball bouncing down
the stairs can raise serious goosebumps.
I’m getting some again right now thinking about the scene as I write
this.
The only real negative I have with the film is the way they
handled the ending. (No spoilers). It’s as if the filmmakers felt they had to
“go big” after being restrained for the first hour and a half. The final ten minutes feel like they belong
in another film and it hurts it some in my mind. In addition, the justification for the events
in the final ten minutes is, at best, guessed at. Nothing is indicated in the film why this is
suddenly happening when it hadn’t before.
It cost it a half a star in my rating (3.5 instead of 4, which then gets
rounded down to 3 for the sake of simplification.)
The Changeling is a Canadian film. It was nominated for ten Genies (the
“Canadian Oscar”) and it won eight of them, including Best Motion Picture. If you like to be in suspense and to watch
something that is actually scary and not just something that squirts buckets of
blood at the screen, then this is one of the better films of its kind that you
can find. If it sounds interesting I definitely recommend you give it a try.
Chip’s Rating: 3 out
of 5 stars
I agree that the ending is needlessly pyrotechnic, but for me, this one is all about the build-up. The most effective scare moment for me is not the ball, but the item placed at the top of the staircase at one point. That raised all of the hair on my arms.
ReplyDeleteI picked this one (and the other horror movie) for the same reason--both of them work almost entirely through atmosphere rather than gore. I like gory movies just fine, but for me, true horror is not about grossing the audience out but about getting under the audience's skin. The Changeling is a smart movie, which is why I like it as much as I do.
Yes, the wheelchair. It worked on me, too.
DeleteThat moment is what I like about horror movies. There are plenty of horror movies where that never happens, but when it does... That sort of visceral reaction is what makes it worthwhile.
DeleteThere are a few moments like that in your horror movie-to-come.