Of all the films on the 1,001 Movies You Must See Before You
Die list In a Lonely Place was one of the most pleasant surprises. Even though it starred Humphrey Bogart during
his biggest days of fame I literally had never even heard of it before. I sat down to watch the film knowing nothing
about it and not expecting much, and when it was through I felt that this was
the second best performance of Bogart’s career. (The Treasure of the Sierra
Madre being the best.) It also cemented
in my mind the leading lady status of Gloria Grahame, who co-stars with
Bogie. Each of them reaches beyond their
expected screen personas – he usually played the gruff but good man and she
usually played the sexy temptress. And
in an era of filmmaking where only one of two endings was possible for a movie
like this I was very pleasantly surprised to see this film take a third path.
Bogie plays Dixon
“Dix” Steele, a Hollywood screenwriter.
If he’s not quite yet washed up, he’s certainly pretty close. He hasn’t had a hit movie since before
WWII. He’s also burned a lot of bridges
because of his violent temper. We see a
couple of examples of that temper early on in the film. He’s very quick to anger, especially if he’s
been drinking, and his response is often far in excess of what triggered him.
He meets his agent at a nightclub. The agent (Art Smith) tries to convince Dix
to adapt a popular novel. Dix has heard
of it and thinks it’s trash – something far beneath his dignity to adapt. The agent points out that Dix needs work and
adapting a popular novel might bring him a hit again. The coat check girl in the nightclub is
actually reading the book and says she can’t put it down. Dix asks her if she will come home with him
and describe the novel to him so he won’t have to read it himself. The woman, whose name is Mildred (Martha
Stewart), thinks his intentions are other than about the book, but goes with
him anyway.
When they get home Dix and Mildred are spotted entering by
his neighbor Laurel Gray (Gloria Grahame).
When Mildred finds out that Dix actually does want to hear her describe
the novel, she is a little relieved.
Once she finishes he knows it is complete trash. He pays for a cab to send her home.
He gets rudely awakened early the next morning by a cop
named Brub (Frank Lovejoy) who turns out to be an old Army buddy of his. Brub explains that Mildred was found murdered
this morning and Dix is the last person to see her alive. The police Captain (Carl Benton Reid) figures
he’s got his man in Dix. Not only was he
the last one to be seen with her, but he has a history of violence that has
resulted in more than one call to the police.
Fortunately for Dix, his neighbor Laurel asserts that she saw Mildred
leave Dix’s apartment safe and sound.
Although highly suspicious of this convenient alibi, the Captain lets
Dix go. He doesn’t drop the
investigation into Dix, though.
Dix, knowing that Laurel saw the woman arrive, but doubtful
that she saw her leave, strikes up a conversation with her when they get
home. They learn about each other and
there is an obvious and immediate attraction between the two. In fact, the viewer may wonder if Laurel just made up that
alibi for him in order to get to know him.
The two start a relationship, which just makes the Captain more
suspicious, and even makes Dix’s friend Brub start to doubt.
During a whirlwind love affair Dix and Laurel experience
many highs, but also several lows. Dix
starts to write like a demon, inspired by his new relationship into bouts of
creativity he hasn’t had for years. On
the other hand, Laurel
starts to see Dix’s violent nature in action.
After one too many of these episodes she even wonders if Dix really did kill
Mildred. When he asks her to marry him
she accepts mostly out of fear of what he might do to her if she refuses. Did Dix really kill Mildred? That would be telling.
I mentioned at the top that films like this, and of this
time, really could end only one of two ways, yet this found a third path to
take. Director Nicholas Ray actually
shot one of those kinds of endings then changed his mind. He brought in the barest number of people he
could to the set and together they improvised a new ending on the spot. This is the one that ended up in the film and
I feel it is much better for it.
While this movie is based on the 1947 Dorothy B. Hughes
novel of the same name, it bears little resemblance to it. In fact, there are parallels from Dix’s
reaction to the trashy novel he’s asked to adapt, yet decides to write something
almost completely different, and the real life changes made from the novel to
the film’s screenplay. I have not read
the book, but its description makes it sound more like The Talented Mr. Ripley
than anything else.
Bogie and Grahame are great together in both the love scenes
and the fear scenes. Before the film
started Bogart had wanted his wife Lauren Bacall to play the role and he had
strongly campaigned for her. Despite
this Nicholas Ray cast his own wife for the part. The producers, who had wanted Ginger Rogers,
were concerned about Ray’s and Grahame’s marriage causing havoc on set so
Grahame actually had to sign a contract stating that she acknowledged that she
had to take direction from Ray during the hours of filming and that she
couldn’t try a wife’s tricks like “nagging, cajoling, or teasing” to get Ray to
change something.
As it turns out, Ray and Grahame secretly separated during
the making of this film, although they would not be divorced for another two
years. Despite this, both made what many
now consider to be perhaps the best film of their careers. I mentioned in my parent post for this
category that Grahame received two Oscar nominations, winning once, but that I
felt she could have been nominated a couple more times. This is one of those times. She showed in this film she could be more
than just the sexy temptress, or bad girl with a heart of gold. She got to play a complex character.
And speaking of which, Bogie also got to play one of the
most complex characters of his career. He made a number of now-classic films, but
most of them re-used the same kind of character he made famous in The Maltese
Falcon. He didn’t often get to stretch
beyond the image movie goers expected of him.
As Dixon Steele in this film I’m sure his performance made many viewers
uncomfortable. Here was a man who is
somewhat sympathetic, but just as you start to identify with him, he has a
violent outburst that just can’t be justified.
The viewer is not shown Mildred’s death, so even we wonder if he really
did kill her. Although Bogie started out
playing bad guys, he had been the hero for ten solid years of very popular
films. (The exception being 1948’s The
Treasure of the Sierra Madre.) This role
now called that heroic image into question, and in a big way.
I’m at a loss as to come up with a reason to avoid this
film. I once worked with a woman who
refused to watch a black and white film – any black and white film. I couldn’t even get her to see Casablanca . If you’re like her then you’ll want to avoid
this film. For everyone else, I highly
recommend it.
Chip’s Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
I also knew little about this film before seeing it a few years ago on my brother's suggestion. It's a stunning movie with remarkable acting from Bogart and Grahame. The ending is a surprise and packs quite an emotional punch!
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you enjoyed it.
DeleteThis is such a strange movie in so many ways. For me, Grahame's performance is entirely wrapped up in the phone conversation at the end. Everything she put into the performance pays off in those moments and I buy the whole thing based on what she does there.
ReplyDeleteI watched this one without much in the way of expectation beyond "Bogart film I'd never seen." I was happy with it at the end.
Good point about the phone call. A Bogie scene that stood out for me was when he the screenwriter in him couldn't resist making up the story of how Mildred was possibly murdered and it's a little TOO good. He gets this look in his eyes that is something else.
DeleteI saw this film largely because of Nicholas Ray as I really liked it. Especially because of Bogart who just brings it.
ReplyDeleteI think I've only seen two or three Ray films. I'd have to look up his resume on IMDB.
DeleteAh, I see that you were very excited about the film. While I may not be swinging myself up to the same enthusiasm I see your points and, yes, I agree it is an excellent film. The fact that it moves so far outside the templates is a huge plus, especially when you watch a lot of movies and feel that you have seen it all before. The biggest asset however is the acting. Bogart could have been nominated, but Grahame was up a against some stiff competition. After Sunset Boulevard and All About Eve there were hardly any nomination spots left.
ReplyDeleteI agree it would have been a very tough year to try to win. In my latest review of The Hunchback of Notre Dame I pointed out that Charles Laughton definitely deserved to get a nomination, if not the win, but most of the Best Actor category were powerhouses of the first order.
DeleteThis is such a great example of what noir could be that I think many modern filmmakers don't understand. It's despairing without being depressing, hard without being grim. Most movies that try for the noir genre today feel there must be that absence of balance, it has to be oppressive and hopeless, it is a tough balance to achieve but this film does it expertly.
ReplyDeleteI think Ray finds some of that balance in the presence of Lovejoy and his wife Jeff Donnell, they have an successful marriage but a somewhat spiky give and take and respect for each other. It shows what Dix aspires to with Laurel but because of his temper she can't feel comfortable giving but obviously could from what we see of her at the beginning when she's forward and a bit brash.
I can't imagine 50's era Ginger Rogers making the character work, late 30's Ginger yes but by the time this was made she had lost much of her early sass. I think Grahame was a thoroughly unique actress so I have a hard imagining anyone playing her roles better but the other name I've read that was bandied about when Betty Bacall proved unavailable was Shelley Winters and I could see her doing well by the part, her more high strung quality would have changed the dynamic between Laurel and Dix though.
Thanks for the in-depth comment. I agree that the other couple was there to represent what society felt was a "real" relationship.
DeleteSorry, but I'm afraid I'm glad Winters was not cast. While not all of her roles irritated me, she seemed to end up whining in a lot of them. At least that's how her performances came across to me (i.e. The Diary of Anne Frank, Lolita).