Writer/director Luis Bunuel’s film The Exterminating Angel
(not to be confused with the 2006 film The Exterminating Angels which actually
has angels in it) has a title that really doesn’t have much to do with the movie. That has not stopped people from generating wild
theories on what it really
means. The simple answer is that Bunuel
had a colleague who was going to write a play with that name and Bunuel liked
the title because he felt people would see “The Exterminating Angel” on a sign
and buy a ticket. It was all about
commercial success, not artistic pretensions.
That’s not to say that this film doesn’t contain any number of patented Bunuel
surreal moments, like a bear and some sheep being kept inside the house in
which the film takes place. I liked this
film, but it will not be for everybody.
I will explain.
First, I should say up front that I am not that big a fan of
Bunuel. I’ve seen ten of his films and
my reactions have been quite varied.
Some I have liked, some I felt were okay, some I disliked, and a couple
I hated. I feel that The Exterminating
Angel is among the best of the movies I have seen from him.
So what happens in this film? Well, as he so often does Bunuel satirizes
the rich, in this case eventually bringing them down to the level of
animals. An elegant dinner party is
being held with around two dozen guests.
As they start to arrive, some of the wait staff inexplicably start to
leave. First it is the maids, then the
kitchen staff, then finally the waiters.
Eventually only the head of the house’s staff is left. None of these people are plotting anything;
they simply have an uncontrollable desire to be somewhere else.
While the house is being emptied of staff, the rich guests
are all oblivious. They go on about
things that sound quite important to them, but really are not. Eventually everyone ends up in a sitting room
to listen to one of them play some songs on a piano. Each time one of the guests thinks about
going home and they start to walk towards the wide exit of the room, they always get
distracted by a new thought or another guest.
Eventually it is early morning and still no one has left. Everyone decides to stay and they do not even
go to the bedrooms. They all lie down on
the floor to sleep.
In the morning, the one remaining staffer brings in a cart
of food and beverages. When he starts to
leave the room for more things for the guests he starts getting side tracked as
well. As the day wears on it finally
becomes apparent to the guests that something is preventing all of them from
leaving this room. It’s not a physical
barrier; there are no mime scenes of people pressing their hands against
something invisible. It’s just that no
matter how much they want to leave they cannot force themselves to do so.
The days wear on and we see these “cultured” people start to
disintegrate. They start treating each
other badly, sneaking into a closet to cheat on their spouses, and fighting
over the remaining supplies. Eventually
they even have to tear into a wall to break a water pipe to get drinking
water. Weeks go by. They eventually descend into almost
animalistic living. It’s this descent
that makes for some entertaining dark satire.
The disappearance of these people has not gone unnoticed by
their families. A crowd has gathered
outside the gates of the house. Despite
the fact that it is wide open, and that they are concerned about their loved
ones, no one can make themselves enter the house, either. Again, there is no physical barrier; just an
inability to take that action.
Those viewers hoping for an explanation of what is happening
will be disappointed. Without spoiling
whether the people ever get out or not, I will say that Bunuel never addresses what
is keeping them there. Oh sure, people
have speculated on what it is. “The hand
of God” is usually the answer people go to first, since the title has “angel”
in it, and since supernatural events are often the work of the gods in fiction.
This film, or at least the main plot of people not being
able to leave a room, is probably one of the best known of Bunuel’s. It has been referenced many times in pop
culture, and in things as widely separated as Woody Allen’s 2011 film Midnight
in Paris where
the main character suggests to Bunuel that he write just such a story –
Bunuel’s reaction is a puzzled “But why can’t they leave?” – and the TV show
Buffy the Vampire Slayer where all the characters find they cannot make
themselves leave a house after a birthday party. (One of the things that made that show so
great was that it didn’t just reference classic monster movies for its
episodes, but things from all over the creative spectrum, including this Bunuel
film.) For those who would like to see
the Buffy version, it was episode 14 of Season 6, which is titled Older and Far
Away. In another nod, that title has as
little to do with the episode as The Exterminating Angel has to do with
Bunuel’s film.
So, if you like seeing the rich “get what’s coming to them”
then you might just enjoy this film. If
you dislike movies where you do not get any concrete answers on why something
is happening, then you probably will not like this film. For everyone else, if it sounds interesting
then I recommend you give it a try.
Chip’s Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
It's been some years since I've seen this film as I really think it's one of his best though I prefer Viridiana and Un Chien Andalou as there's a few films of his I'm going to watch next month.
ReplyDeleteI would say my top three Bunuel films, in no particular order, are this one, The Young One (aka La Joven), and The Discreet Charm of the Bourgousie.
DeleteChip-- You always have such a diverse taste in movies. I feel like I learn something every time I come to your page.
ReplyDeleteWow, thank you very much. That means a lot to me.
DeleteNow that I've seen this, I feel like I can comment on your review of it.
ReplyDeleteI think I agree with your top three Bunuel films, with Viridiana probably coming in fourth. I find him really hit or miss. I tend to like him more when there's at least an internal narrative structure to his absurdity, and The Exterminating Angel has that internal consistency.
I have a fairly simplistic reading of what it might mean. I'm sure the reality goes deeper, but I'm content with this:
http://1001plus.blogspot.com/2013/10/trapped-in-closet.html
"I tend to like him more when there's at least an internal narrative structure to his absurdity"
ReplyDeleteI just saw his film El and you might like it. Not only does it have a consistent narrative, it's downright Hitchcockian with a woman marrying a man everybody loves only to find he's psychotically jealous of any contact she has with anyone other than him.