Friday, November 2, 2012

Movie – Sherlock: A Study in Pink (2010)

There have been many, many incarnations of Sherlock Holmes over the years.  Some of them have contributed permanent additions to the mythos surrounding the character – in some cases these are things that his creator – Sir Arthur Conan Doyle – never intended, or could have ever imagined.  I once read that Holmes was one of only five fictional characters that were known to every nation and every tribe on Earth.  (Superman was another; I can’t remember the rest.)  ‘Sherlock’ has chosen to show us a version of Holmes set in the present, with him being a very modern man.  It is a very well written show that appeals to both the Sherlock Holmes fan, and the casual viewer, alike.

‘Sherlock’ is considered a TV show in the U.K., but to this American it seems strange to have an entire TV “season” consist of three movie-length episodes.  Consequently, I will be reviewing the individual episodes as movies, rather than reviewing all three episodes collectively as a TV season.  For this Misquoted Movies category I will be writing about the first movie: A Study in Pink.  I will write about the other “episodes” at a later date.

Holmes fans will recognize the title “A Study in Pink” to be a takeoff on the title of the first Conan Doyle novel A Study in Scarlet – the one that introduced the world to Sherlock Holmes.  One of the things the show’s creators have done that is quite brilliant is that they use some of the classic stories, but update them for today, and put a slightly different spin on them.  The result is that the people who know the stories well will recognize and appreciate how they have been modernized, but at the same time not be quite sure how things are going to play out.

Examples in A Study in Pink are the first meeting of Holmes and Watson; the modern day misinterpretations of why two single men might be sharing living quarters; how Mrs. Hudson has to keep reminding them that she’s their landlady (current day), not their housekeeper (classic stories); how Conan Doyle’s stories, being written as if by Dr. Watson, now become a blog that Watson has where he writes about their adventures; and many other little touches.  An example of something switched up is the “rache” clue left by the first victim.  It is first thought to be one thing, and then revealed to be the other, in both original story and this movie.  The difference is that the mistake and real meaning have been switched.

You don’t have to be familiar with the stories to follow what is going on, though.  Every character is introduced so that we understand who they are.  A Study in Pink opens with Dr. Watson having been wounded in Afghanistan.  He comes home with a limp.  In a great nod to the Conan Doyle stories, where Watson’s wound was mentioned as being either in his leg or his shoulder, this incarnation has Watson with a shoulder wound, but a psychosomatic limp.  And even the battle location carries over because Watson was injured in what is now Afghanistan in the original 1880s novel and 130 years later the British are still fighting in that region of the world.

Watson is a little at odds and not quite sure what to do with himself now that he is no longer a military doctor.  He runs into an old colleague (readers of the novel will recognize “Young Stamford”) who has another friend who is looking for someone to split expenses with on an in-London flat.  The other friend turns out to be Sherlock Holmes.  Things move rapidly, and Watson finds himself moving in with Holmes.

To his surprise Watson finds Detective Inspector Lestrade (another familiar name to the readers) calling Holmes in on a case.  Dr. Watson expresses surprise that the police would consult with an amateur.  What follows is a great scene.  You can watch it below.



There’s another great sequence where Watson is semi-abducted in order to meet with a mysterious man who seems to have a great interest in Sherlock Holmes.  The viewer isn’t sure for a while who he might be.  Here’s a hint: his name starts with “M”.  The actor – Mark Gatiss – is actually one of the creators of the show.  (And there is another great modernization of this character for the readers who are familiar with how the character appears in the Conan Doyle stories.)

Benedict Cumberbatch (Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy) plays the title character.  Martin Freeman (The Hobbit) plays Dr. Watson.  Both of them do great jobs in their roles, but the show just wouldn’t work if Cumberbatch didn’t completely embody what a modern day Sherlock Holmes would be like.  He is the heart and soul of the show.

I should mention the other two recent adaptations of this character because most people are probably familiar with at least one of them and are wondering how ‘Sherlock’ compares to them.  First are the two Robert Downey, Jr. theatrical movies.  If you have seen those, please try to block them from your mind.  Sherlock Holmes is not a slovenly, low class, Mixed Martial Arts master.  Other than the names of a few characters, those movies have no connection to Sherlock Holmes.

The other recent adaptation is the TV show Elementary, which has just debuted in the U.S.  It is a direct result of the success of the BBC series.  It, too, has a modern day Sherlock Holmes; in this case he is in New York.  The jury is still out on it, but so far ‘Sherlock’ has been quite a bit better than Elementary.

The title of that show does lead me to the misquote.  In none of the four novels and fifty-six short stories that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote did Holmes ever say “Elementary, my dear Watson”.  He did say “elementary” once, and he did use the phrase “my dear Watson”, but he never used them together.  The quote actually comes from one of the first sound movie adaptations.  It caught on and eventually entered the public consciousness.

Holmes aficionados usually list the Basil Rathbone and Jeremy Brett interpretations of Sherlock Holmes as the gold standards.  I think we can safely add Benedict Cumberbatch’s Holmes to those.  I highly recommend you watch A Study in Pink.

Chip’s Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

           DVD                      Blu-ray                 Instant Video



      Paperback                   Kindle

4 comments:

  1. I absolutely love the BBC series and I am glad I started seeing it after the second season ended, so I didn't have to wait too much for another episode to come out. The production is amazing, but for me, the two leading men are just fantastic and perfect for their parts, especially Cumberbatch. A highly recommended tv show!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. When the first season ended with a cliffhanger it bugged me, especially since I thought Freeman was going to have to go shoot the Hobbit movies before he did a second season of this. As it turns out, he shot season 2 before, so I got to see it with only a years wait.

      Delete
  2. Bored on a Friday night, I finally brought up Study in Pink on Netflix and decided to give this whole Sherlock thing a try, this thing all my friends have been banging on about for years now.

    I've only watched the first episode, but it's pretty fair to say this has blown me away. It's so much better than I thought it would be. My husband is impressed with it too - he came in halfway through, got sucked in, and went back and watched it from the beginning.

    I cannot *believe* the production value of this show. It's practically movie-quality, and so much better than many, MANY other BBC shows.

    Anyhoodle, while I didn't watch Sherlock on only your recommendation (I have been listening to many online friends talking about it since it came out), I did want to let you know that you are one of the voices that ultimately convinced me to watch it.

    And thank you for that. Because crap, this is good. But now I have to carefully space out the remaining FIVE episodes. At least they're nice and long.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad to be part of the chorus. (Did I at least get a solo?) :-)

      Thanks for coming back and letting me know what you thought of one of my recommendations. Every once in a great while someone will take the time to do that and I greatly appreciate it.

      Just a heads up on a couple of things - 1. You may find yourself wanting to watch the second season's first episode right after watching the first season's last episode, so allow yourself the time. 2. The second episode of the first season is okay, but not as good as the other two (in my opinion), so do not get discouraged if it does not live up to your expectations after loving the first episode.

      Delete